“Past presidents and sitting governors would be able to remove a president for political reasons. Hey, I don’t like the guy. Hey, he’s implementing too many of the plans of the Left/Right.”
—
My God,I did not know this.
.
Mears, this is the way I read the loosely described proposal.
If others can point to a reason why I misconstrued the suggestion, I don’t mind being proven wrong.
It doesn’t make sense to me to have past presidents or sitting governors step in, if the terms are the same as what we have now. That’s why it would seem their criteria would be different.
Thanks for the response.