Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/18/2017 3:54:40 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: nickcarraway

IIRC it is against American law to assassinate a foreign head of state.


2 posted on 04/18/2017 3:57:48 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

“We knock off that ONE GUY and it’s OVER..!”

Sounds REALLY tempting, I have to admit.

“They’re all SUFFERING, they really LOATHE their life there, they’d shower us with rose petals, they’d be overjoyed..!”

What a sucker’s play. Sure, there are those that saw SK dramas on smuggled DVD’s, they’ve heard the rumors.

PLENTY of them still go in for the hype, in Saddam’s words we’d be “welcomed by bullets and SHOES”.

The other wolves would simply jump in and take his place at the top.

The future really IS unification but anyone who thinks it would be a Cake Walk is living in La La Land.

LOTS of people would have to be vaporized.


3 posted on 04/18/2017 3:58:52 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
"What if America assassinated Kim Jong Un"?

Well, I for one would host a celebratory barbecue, and be thankful that millions of brainwashed and oppressed North Koreans might someday walk in the light of freedom...

Unfortunately, that's not going to happen.

4 posted on 04/18/2017 4:00:17 PM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

If he were assassinated, another member of the junta would replace him and the regime would grind on.


5 posted on 04/18/2017 4:03:15 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

A lot of North Koreans would be happy?


6 posted on 04/18/2017 4:03:16 PM PDT by HotKat (Politicians are like diapers; they need to be changed often and for the same reason. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
I don't think America can assassinate another leader of any foreign country...

Besides, that's what China is for...

7 posted on 04/18/2017 4:05:14 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ( "The Force Awakens!!!"...Trump and Pence: MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Because North Korea is such a black-hole in terms of human intelligence, the U.S. intelligence community wouldn’t be able to confidently assess that the man or woman (Kim’s sister, for instance) who replaces Kim wouldn’t be just as vicious or unpredictable.

Maybe, but they would be a lot less eager to get in a game of chicken with Trump. Having your enemies fear you is a good thing.

9 posted on 04/18/2017 4:08:22 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

We don’t want to be a part of that because then it would be easier for foreign nut-jobs to think they can do it to our leaders or any other random leaders around the world.

Much more global instability would follow. Long-term ill effects would outweigh any short-term benefits.


10 posted on 04/18/2017 4:08:56 PM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (((( ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Kim Jong-il began a tradition of opening every senior staff meeting with a video of Nicolae Ceaușescu and his wife being shot. I'm sure the leadership of North Korea would act quickly and ruthlessly to maintain control.
11 posted on 04/18/2017 4:10:07 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I think he should get a Scalia/Breitbart style heart attack... or perhaps his Mercedes should inexplicably accelerate to 120 MPH and hit a tree.


13 posted on 04/18/2017 4:11:19 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

I heard a discussion on the radio yesterday about why someone in the inner circle doesn’t take Kim out. They concluded that, since the lives and privileges of people that close to the top depend on Kim or at least the continuation of the regime without Kim, there is no one who would do that.


15 posted on 04/18/2017 4:13:50 PM PDT by Southside_Chicago_Republican (If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Here’s one problem I haven’t seen discussed.

You’re dealing with a hereditary line of succession in a communist totalitarian state. Who would be the heir apparent after Kim Jong Un? It seems to me that there is no clear replacement that would continue that type of succession.

That creates an entirely unpredictable chain of events in leadership. Perhaps good, perhaps bad. However there is no real way to know.

I doubt even the Chinese have a pipeline into the would be cadre of generals or senior staff to know who could or would pick up the pieces in such an event. The regime is so paranoid at this point that I suspect they would treat communication with the Chinese with equal hostility as they would with ROK or US agents.


17 posted on 04/18/2017 4:18:27 PM PDT by PittsburghAfterDark (The American media: We do what the Soviet media did without the guns to our head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

We go assassinate someone else leader. Then what right do we have to object to some other nation assassinating ours?

I don’t think this is the road we should go down.

Even with Hussein, we captured the guy. We turned him over to the new government. They determined what to do with him.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/05/world/middleeast/05cnd-saddam.html


19 posted on 04/18/2017 4:22:26 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Uh, he would be dead?


20 posted on 04/18/2017 4:23:07 PM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

What if the Norks nuke Pearl Harbor or Tokyo?


22 posted on 04/18/2017 4:25:35 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Believe me, anyone but Kim Jong un in power is far better to deal with

This article articulates what’s called “wishful thinking” that some day Kim Jong Un would give up the bomb somehow.

The risk is that one day America has to deal with Kim Jong un with advanced nuclear weapon and delivery system

That may be kind of stalemate to create peace... if America let Kim Jong un take over the South Korea


23 posted on 04/18/2017 4:30:44 PM PDT by Lee25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Then he completes the holy triad of war. Precise (Syria), Powerful (MOAB), and Decapitation of the enemy leadership) NK.

I wonder how it would sound in the media? NK leader dies in his sleep? Will he catch a disease that kills in 3-6 months?


32 posted on 04/18/2017 5:00:11 PM PDT by Fhios
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

North Korea remains in a state of war with the south, and the US through membership in the UN. No permanent treaty exists. Kim Jong Un is the head of the armed forces of NK so is therefore fair game. Giving the South Koreans a missile and coordinates would alleviate any legal handwringing.


33 posted on 04/18/2017 5:03:47 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dick Bachert

Mr. B, your video is required svp.


34 posted on 04/18/2017 5:05:11 PM PDT by onona (Keeping the faith will be our new directive for the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Not easy for the U.S. to do. Our HUMINT in North Koreo is limited.

China on the other hand has the intel and operation apparatus needed. China most likely already has a successor chosen.

37 posted on 04/18/2017 5:12:19 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson