Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford
Peace, nathanbedford,

Finally, this is only the last line of defense, there are innumerable steps along the way which make a "runaway convention" virtually impossible and render the need for the states to fail to ratify very likely superfluous.

The same was said in 1787 and we ended up with a runaway convention. Yes, the result that time was fortuitous, but the delegates which will be sent to the Article V convention aren't made of the same stuff as the Framers. Any change to the Articles of Confederation required unanimous consent of all the States. During the Constitutional Convention, that rule was changed. Why should we trust that any claims of "only 13 to defeat" and "virtually impossible" are true when we know that this did happen in the only example in united States history?


James R. McClure Jr.
Jeffersonian Anti-Federalist Democrat

19 posted on 04/25/2017 7:27:59 AM PDT by James R. McClure Jr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: James R. McClure Jr.
Answering the "Runaway Convention" Myth
21 posted on 04/25/2017 8:46:19 AM PDT by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: James R. McClure Jr.

And so then, just how would you propose to take our nation back from the elites that inhabit DC?


26 posted on 04/25/2017 3:38:36 PM PDT by exnavy (God save the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson