Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
The government argued it only matters that she made a false statement, not whether it had any impact on its decision to grant refugee status.

If that is the government's position then the government is a ass. This argument cuts against a fundamental requirement of the exercise of administrative discretion - that it be "reasonable," e.g. that it be based upon a valid stated reason. That a representation be "material" is an important filter in any decision-making.

17 posted on 04/26/2017 1:22:45 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: AndyJackson

There’s a fair argument on the other side for a “bright line” rule; ie: that no falsehood should be tolerated in granting the extraordinary privilege of citizenship. Otherwise, we become embroiled in endless shaded arguments about what lies “matter” and we inherently accept that some lying is OK. Not a good posture.

Another argument can be made that someone willing to tell any lie to gain American citizenship has demonstrated a fundamental disregard for the rule of law and for the integrity of the legal process in becoming a citizen.


73 posted on 04/26/2017 2:58:59 PM PDT by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson