Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China ‘might agree’ to UN oil embargo of North Korea
South China Morning Post ^ | April 29th, 2017 | Shi Jiangtao

Posted on 04/28/2017 2:59:46 PM PDT by Mariner

Beijing would consider an oil embargo against Pyongyang in the case of further nuclear tests by its reclusive neighbour, according to diplomatic analysts. A suspension of oil supplies from Beijing could deal a much harder blow to Pyongyang than any of the existing sanctions, possibly paralysing the government of Kim Jong-un.

But analysts said China was unlikely to impose further sanctions on North Korea without a mandate from the UN Security Council, given Beijing’s sweeping ban on coal imports from the North since February.

Though economic data, especially on the sensitive crude-oil trade, is sketchy, analysts believe Pyongyang has for years relied on oil imports almost entirely from China, its top trade partner and economic aid provider.

(Excerpt) Read more at scmp.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
If we can get Russia aboard, or at least to abstain, the UN would be almost functional.

And I'm still wondering what has been promised to China.

1 posted on 04/28/2017 2:59:46 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mariner

“And I’m still wondering what has been promised to China. “

I suspect the conversation went something like this...

Trump: I’m gonna knock the sh@t out of North Korea.
China: We won’t allow it.
Trump: I will put American and South Korean troops in the North.
China: We won’t allow it.
Trump: Well, you have a choice. We can do it, in which case we will take over the North. Or, you can do it. It’s your choice.
China: We’ll get back with you shortly.


2 posted on 04/28/2017 3:05:19 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Embargo rocket fuel....


3 posted on 04/28/2017 3:08:32 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

If true this is a big deal.


4 posted on 04/28/2017 3:10:44 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

Yep, it would bring about regime collapse, after millions die. So sad.
At least all the dead would be NORKS.

But it would take at least one year, maybe two.

And there’s no assurance it would not provoke them to assault South Korea and Japan while they still have energy.


5 posted on 04/28/2017 3:20:01 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

China can use the UN for stalling purposes. Why not?


6 posted on 04/28/2017 3:24:10 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

China will try to sucker us, rest assured.


7 posted on 04/28/2017 3:27:46 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Poison their rice fields. Starve the country....if they take him out, restore food.


8 posted on 04/28/2017 3:49:11 PM PDT by sanjuanbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

True......China will try to sucker us,

Experts are very suspicious of china, satellite pics show they’re still trading coal with them


9 posted on 04/28/2017 4:10:12 PM PDT by wiseone (india,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

It will cripple their economy, if Iran does not step up to replace the oil from China. China has already slowed coal shipments to North Korea.

If we can get the UN security council to agree to sanctions on any oil imports to North Korea, we could see U.S. ships interdicting oil shipments to North Korea.


10 posted on 04/28/2017 4:25:20 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

I think the leverage is the THADD system being installed in South Korea.

It can, operationally, perform anti-missile interceptions of ballistic missiles fired from China, if it had such a mission. We have assured China that is not the mission for THADD in South Korea, but if they want it removed, it will require the end of North Korea’s nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs. As long as North Korea keeps those programs operating, THADD will stay.

THADD in South Korea is to China like having a Chinese THADD system in Mexico.

I think they will join in every proposed pressure on North Korea. Then it will be waiting to see if the North implodes, or a new less belligerent military clique assumes control via an internal coup, or China manages to put up a puppet (hasn’t had that power inside North Korea), or if stupid Kim acts like Saddam, thinking his military is way more powerful than it really is.

If China does not go along, I expect Trump will punish their trade with us, severely, high tariffs, AND lock Chinese state controlled enterprises out of the U.S. domestic market as well, either their imports here or operations here.


11 posted on 04/28/2017 4:39:25 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

I imagine we will next put them up in Wake, Guam and Hawaii.


12 posted on 04/28/2017 4:43:00 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
And I'm still wondering what has been promised to China.

Me too, but maybe it's worth it.

13 posted on 04/28/2017 4:56:56 PM PDT by libertylover (In 2016 small-town America got tired of being governed by people who don't know a boy from a girl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Russia will veto. China must do it without a Security Council resolution. China just needs to decide whether they will help us or not.


14 posted on 04/28/2017 5:18:48 PM PDT by maro (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maro

“Russia will veto.”

They don’t have a dog in this hunt.

They will abstain. Mostly because of the masterful PR campaign underway now.


15 posted on 04/28/2017 6:17:12 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: maro

Russia vetoed the last Security Council resolution condemning NK. China abstained. If you run a Google search, you will find articles about this.


16 posted on 04/28/2017 6:38:16 PM PDT by maro (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson