Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK

Not sure if you were quoting someone or not. But I disagree with this:

But in 1860 almost 100% of Northerners understood that slavery **in the South** was a precondition for Union and so would let it be.

I would say that Northern politcians largely understood and accepted this. Abolotionist New England probably did not accept this on its face. This was a moral issue.


124 posted on 05/03/2017 8:58:47 AM PDT by WVMnteer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: WVMnteer

WVMnteer: ** “But I disagree with this:

‘But in 1860 almost 100% of Northerners understood that slavery **in the South** was a precondition for Union and so would let it be.’

“I would say that Northern politcians largely understood and accepted this.
Abolotionist New England probably did not accept this on its face.
This was a moral issue. “ **

Agreed, I used “almost 100%” as opposed to hazarding a guess of, say, 95%.
Indeed, iirc, in 1861 when secession came, those New England Abolitionists said they were happy to see the South go, and take their slaves with them.
So perhaps even they understood the price of Abolition was disunion.


128 posted on 05/03/2017 11:48:28 AM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson