Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DarkSavant

‘IT was about slavery in the south, it was about preserving the Union to the north.’

it would not have been necessary for the Union to fight to preserve itself, had the confederate states not seceded-—over slavery, as you yourself agreed was the southern incentive...

so in that regard, yes the war was over slavery...


110 posted on 05/01/2017 6:41:12 PM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: IrishBrigade
had the confederate states not seceded-—over slavery<>BR>
No it wasn't

They had every right to secede, for any reason, even slavery. The Union chose not to respect their right, and went to war. The North was the aggressor. The North fought to preserve the Union, thereby making the Feds a hegemon the States were wholly subservient to. How was this a victory?
116 posted on 05/01/2017 7:07:53 PM PDT by DarkSavant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson