Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zeestephen

‘The three men going to jail discussed this issue with her on multiple occasions, while under the impression that they had a lawyer-client relationship with her, and that she was their advocate.’

well, you know what they say; ignorance is no excuse...


18 posted on 06/02/2017 1:18:57 PM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: IrishBrigade
Re: well, you know what they say; ignorance is no excuse...

That was not my point.

From memory, the University legal counsel was a Black female, and she could have been charged with the same crimes as the three men she testified against.

But no charges were filed against her, and, as far as I know, the state Bar took no action against her, either.

Also, the state had to drop at least one charge against the three men because she was a University attorney.

Bottom Line - the three men were charged and convicted because they were senior executives.

McQueary got $12 million for testifying against them.

The staff lawyer avoided prosecution and kept her law license by testifying against them.

And the anonymous shower victim, who, as I recall, never testified under oath against anybody, but who received a multi-million dollar insurance payment, also helped to enrage the jury that convicted former Penn State President Spanier of a misdemeanor.

26 posted on 06/02/2017 6:31:11 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson