Posted on 06/04/2017 8:12:33 PM PDT by WilliamIII
PITTSBURGH (KDKA) — A Pittsburgh forensic pathologist says the investigation into the JFK assassination is far from over.
On Nov. 22, 1963, President John F. Kennedy was murdered in broad daylight in Dallas, Texas. The Warren Commission concluded Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone when he shot the president from the 6th floor of the Texas Book Depository. For years, many have doubted those conclusions and believed it was a greater conspiracy.
One of the most outspoken critics of the Warren Report is nationally-acclaimed forensic pathologist Dr. Cyril Wecht.
(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...
Where did you get the idea that an identical weapon was found in his home?
exactly right...every shred of evidence points to him alone....after 54 years..geez, leave it alone. I noticed the driving force of all these conspiracy theories,.is that we were all robbed, cuz JFK was gonna get out of VIETNAM...which there no evidence of either ...trying to re write history
good point. No evidence. Except Zapruder film. And docs at Parkland. Other than those eyewitnesses, nothing to see
there a famous head on picture after the first shot,and every secret service agent has their head turned looking back at the depository building...co workers of Oswald heard the shots directly above them from the 5th floor...you just cant ignore evidence like that.
I saw some information from Oswald’s Marine records once. He had the same MOS as I did, which was avionics on aircraft. That also means he more than likely had a secret clearance as I did. I suspect he was a com/nav man on f-86’s. His going to Russia having that clearance has always been problematic for me, unless he was CIA. This was one of the highest rated MOS in the service and means you scored extremely high in testing. His shooting score doesn’t mean squat. I barely qualified in boot camp, but three years later qualified high expert and I wear glasses.
nobody in the oligarchy wants to actually solve it.....
bttt
Wecht has been sniffing the Formaldehyde for too long.
Heard him speak at a JFK symposium at Georgetown Un. in 1974 and he hasn’t said anything new since. There were so many communists, wackos, and very weird people at that conference that I had to check my own sanity afterwards.
Read the Warren Commission Report Summary volume and saw that Mark Lane (Mr. “Rush to Judgment” fraud, had lied many times as to what the Commission did or did not do. You just had to wade through the massive volume to find our the truth.
Lane, a far-left Marxist nutjob (attorney for Marxist religious cult leader and murdered Jim Jones/Jonestown Massacre), member of the Hanoi support group Citizens’ Commission of Inquiry, involved with the far-right anti-Israel publication something like “The National Interest” (he reportedly got bounced from it for being f*cking crazy),
was also reportedly the COmmunist Party’s secret candidate for the U.S. congress in 1965 but it was derailed by a sudden, unexplained withdrawal on Lane’s part. Never explained it.
Welcome to the wonderful world of the wacky and the weird, and I’m not just talking about Congress.
you aren’t offering any arguments, just ad hominem attacks. Others who were skeptics of Warren report included Sen Schweicker (Reagans proposed running mate in 76) , and two members of the commission, Hale Boggs and Richard Russell. None were communists
who’s ignoring that evidence? Nobody says there wasn’t a shooter - or shooters- in the book building. It’s just that there’s good reason to suspect there were also shooters up the grassy knoll. Many witnesses thought so in real time
That’s why you see all the suppositions as opposed to evidence.
Sorry, but you must not have done much reading if you think there’s no evidence of more than one shooter
One other point, that always makes me wonder. Many years ago, an OLD Marine showed me how to empty a Springfield in under 5 seconds, by working the bolt with thumb and forefinger and pulling the trigger with your pinkie. He was a China Marine, pre WW2, when the 4th Marines were in Shanghai.
It takes some practice, but you can practice dry fire... Just saying.
I suspect that if there are any bombshells in those documents (i.e. anything that seriously contradicts the official explanation), they will never see the light of day.
The Deep State will see to that.
Think about it. The headline blares “Khrushchev shot in Red Square”. The world would know who dun it it 10 seconds. So why is this different?
Cruz was already beaten by that point in the primary.
The only question remaining was, could the GOP Establishment steal the nomination from Trump using parliamentary maneuvers at the convention?
Fortunately, the answer was no (or else Herself would be President). The convention happened, Trump was the nominee, and the rest is history.
Whether Cruz's father ever had anything to do with Oswald was never a factor, only a sideshow.
I agree. They needed someone in the window with a rifle to help take the eyes off the shooter in the knoll and cause confusion.
Precisely, or much of the material may be blacked out. You’d sure think that she would want the truth to come out though.
“I’m reading Bugliosi’s book,”
Bugliosi is a lying, disgusting, self serving, male Gloria Alred!!
A sailing couple was ruthlessly killed by a young couple who then stole their sailboat. They were caught, bullet holes in the boat,
Bugliosi defended the b!+ch and then wrote a self serving book entitled “And The Sea Will Tell”. If you read that piece of swill, even his twisting of facts and motives to get her set free, will convince you of his evilness. You have to read it on the “throne” so you won’t have far to go to puke your guts out.
Who GAINED from JFK’s death???? LBJ.
Winner!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.