Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ifinnegan

“Was the first life not a species?”

No, by definition. A “species” is a taxonomic term — used to distinguish one species from another. When there was just one life form, there were no ‘species’ of life — just life and not-life.


117 posted on 06/15/2017 3:31:43 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

“No, by definition. A “species” is a taxonomic term — used to distinguish one species from another. When there was just one life form, there were no ‘species’ of life — just life and not-life.”

Why do you assume there was only “one life form”?

How do you define “just life and not-life”? (You see how invoking life vs non-life brings us back to a type of creationism).


119 posted on 06/15/2017 3:34:51 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA; ifinnegan

>>When there was just one life form, there were no ‘species’ of life

Speciation includes the ability to identify and procreate with similar life forms.

RNA Molecules which were not able to procreate with one another would still be molecular life forms - but different molecular species.


121 posted on 06/15/2017 4:04:32 PM PDT by HLPhat (It takes a Republic TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS - not a populist Tyranny of the Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson