[BroJoeK]

HLPhat: "The universe in which light from celestial bodies 13.5 billion light years away is visible, today, here on Earth - 13.5 billion years later. "

And that is only one, albeit a particularly glaring example, of a huge number of scientific problems with "young earth".
So the basic issue is, can we treat both science and the Bible with all due respect and without doing harm to either?
I think we can, but it takes some careful analysis & understanding.

[Bob434]

[[And that is only one, albeit a particularly glaring example, of a huge number of scientific problems with “young earth”.]]

Number one it’s not really a problem IF you study the issue- there are answers to it- secondly, you discount the actual im;possibilities associated with macroevolution (ie: chemical impossibilities, biological, thermodynamic, mathematical- any one of which puts a nail in the coffin for hte idea of macroevolution possibility- but taken all together- ensure that it’s not even remotely possible- yet you claim that the light year issue undoes young earth when there are answers to it? Study it some- you’ll find what you are looking for IF you look objectively-

[HLPhat]

>>can we treat both science and the Bible with all due respect and without doing harm to either?

"Truth is Great and will prevail"
--Thomas Jefferson

Kind'a the whole point of the 1st amendment.

The Dominionist Useful Idiot branch of Cultural Marxists-R-Us, OTOH, seem to have something else in mind.