To: HLPhat
HLPhat:
"I understand, per the pretentiously vapid act youve put on display, that you probably wouldnt be able to read and understand such a paper... if one did exist." So let's see if I understand your attitude:
- First you insult me by demanding I produce a link to an article which has no relevance to this thread.
- Next you insult me because I refused to jump down your rabbit hole.
- Then you insult me by claiming that even if I did jump down your hole, and found such a publication -- which may not even exist! -- I'm still just too stupid to understand it.
And all those arrogant insults are your method for defending what idea, exactly, relating to this thread?
IOW, are you here to explain how the true "odds of evolution" are greater than zero, or not, and why?
703 posted on
07/09/2017 10:20:39 AM PDT by
BroJoeK
(a little historical perspective...)
To: BroJoeK
>>an article which has no relevance to this thread.
An article on a practical methodology for demonstrating
abiogenesis has no relevance to the odds of the process of natural selection in evolution.
Lol. Maybe in BroJoe land. Here in reality land a paper like that, or the inability to produce one, is quite relevant.
707 posted on
07/09/2017 11:47:59 AM PDT by
HLPhat
(It takes a Republic TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS - not a populist Tyranny of the Majority)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson