Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrEdd

The choice presented as I understood it was to either:
allow the bill to be done [behind closed doors] resulting in a crappy bill

or

put the bill in the open to make it better.


Again, I don’t think that’s what’s there. Sure, we may end up with legislation that is crappy - but that it’s done behind closed doors does not assert such. That’s one of the things that’s false IMO. Another is that allowing it to be in the open would make it better. I’m not at all convinced that’s true. Indeed I believe putting out there would subject it to endless dem obstruction.

With the dem promises to stop all work at all cost, do you think it may be possible that they’re keeping it behind closed doors to prevent such obstruction? Isn’t that at least a possibility?

Separately, there is going to have to be more than one piece of legislation unwrapping the 0bamacare insurance scam. This will [hopefully] be the first. Then tax reform. Some may pound their chest and proclaim it should all be done now - and that sounds great. I hope that happens.

We’re on the same side i think - I’m different in that I’m not willing to give up hope on a bill that would facilitate tax reform and lead to eventual full repeal.


23 posted on 06/20/2017 6:56:15 AM PDT by Principled (OMG I'm so tired of all this winning....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Principled

If it’s ok to concoct the bill behind closed doors, then you were ok with Pelosi doing it?


25 posted on 06/20/2017 6:58:29 AM PDT by WilliamIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson