***A foreign national who wishes to enter the United States to live with or visit a family member, like Doe’s wife or Dr. Elshikh’s mother-in-law, clearly has such a relationship.***
True, but they are not citizens and have no Constitutional right of entry, so I don't get the distinction.
I guess the distinction is that if there are problems the government has specific people to approach for information. This is not random tourists wandering around with no one living here in touch with their activities or purposes.
Doesn’t matter if they have the relationship or not; it isn’t the court’s choice who is let in or not, it is the president’s as authorized by both the constitution and congress. Or is the court trying to imply that the constitution is unconstitutional?
I wonder if the courts would have a vastly different opinion if they were stripped of their vast layers of security. ‘If there’s a problem, call 911’ should be the response from the people to their courts, not permitting them to surround themselves with unconstitutional searches and rings of arms denied to the people.