Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California's giant water tunnels win first crucial approval
CNBC ^ | 26 June 2017

Posted on 06/28/2017 6:51:54 AM PDT by Lorianne

U.S. wildlife officials gave crucial first approval Monday to California Gov. Jerry Brown's decades-old ambitions to build two massive tunnels that would re-engineer the water system in the nation's most populous state.

The National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said the $16 billion project likely will not endanger more than a dozen federally protected species in the largest fresh-water estuary on the West Coast.

The decision is the first in a series of federal and state rulings that will determine the fate of the twin 35-mile (55-kilometer) tunnels, California's biggest water project in decades that is expected to take more than 10 years to complete.

The project would suck part of the Sacramento River into two four-story-high tunnels running below the river's delta with the San Joaquin River.


TOPICS: Government; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: karnage

>
Enviros have opposed this most strenuously from Day One. They will continue to oppose it
>

Let’s see HOW much, now that Moonbeam got the green light to (possibly) extinct up to 12 species of...whatever ;)

I suspect, like Code Pink and WoW, since it’s their side, the opposition will be minimal to none.


21 posted on 06/28/2017 8:41:35 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7; HLPhat; Yo-Yo

$16 billion will pay for 20-25 desalination plants like the one we have here in San Diego. Our plant in Carlsbad provides for a little less than 1/10th of our water at about twice the prices. These numbers will get better over time.

I did an analysis once. 150 desalination plants could provide for all of the state’s drinking water, permanently, for homes and businesses. That includes lawn watering, etc. Spending the money on desalination plants would mean no more reservoirs, no more tunnels, no more farms going without water because of bait fish.

Maybe I’ll try and submit it to the SacBee for publication.


22 posted on 06/28/2017 8:52:45 AM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

No, the CA enviros continue to beef on all occasions and at every opportunity. They make gubner moonbeam appear marginally rational.


23 posted on 06/28/2017 8:58:49 AM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Quality_Not_Quantity
"likely will not endanger more than a dozen federally protected species"

You are misreading a poorly written sentence. What was meant is that there are more than a dozen federally protected species that might be affected, and that the project likely will not endanger any of them.

24 posted on 06/28/2017 9:02:43 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

Dam. Just dam.
What could go wrong?

Imagine the possibilities.


25 posted on 06/28/2017 9:33:52 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mlo
You are misreading a poorly written sentence.

You're probably right - especially the 'poorly written' part.

26 posted on 06/28/2017 9:43:14 AM PDT by Quality_Not_Quantity (I'm sick and tired of being sick and tired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tom h
>>Spending the money on desalination plants would mean no more reservoirs, no more tunnels, no more farms going without water because of bait fish.

It would also castrate watermelon environmentalists of their ability to plant their seeds of dominion.

They won’t turn over that power willingly.

https://lawaterkeeper.org/environmentalists-applaud-city-of-hermosa-beachs-vote-to-oppose-coastal-desalination/

Etc..

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Environmentalists+oppose+desalination

27 posted on 06/28/2017 9:58:31 AM PDT by HLPhat (It takes a Republic TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS - not a populist Tyranny of the Majority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Quality_Not_Quantity

All you have to do is look at windmills and bald eagles. Case closed.


28 posted on 06/28/2017 11:25:11 AM PDT by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Meanwhile they literally stopped water being delivered to the central valley where a large majority of vegetables and other crops are grown for the whole country. For a minnow that is not endangered.
Think Chinatown but instead of water the insiders want the land.


29 posted on 06/28/2017 2:03:48 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
and they're gonna have a dozen hydropower plants hooked up to this fiasco too, right?

what'd ya mean no...

30 posted on 06/28/2017 5:10:56 PM PDT by Chode (My job is not to represent the world. My job is to represent the United States of America-#45 DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson