EMTs and cops wear gloves when they respond to anything. In this AIDS and herpes world not wearing gloves will get you killed.
Suppose an evil person dusts a grocery store with anthrax. Or any of a million other nasty things. Any amount of opioid will kill a toddler. The possibilities are ALWAYS endless. I can kill a building full of people with seemingly random crap from the hardware store. Life is fragile, the list of ways to end it infinite.
and very very compact.
“EMTs and cops wear gloves when they respond to anything. In this AIDS and herpes world not wearing gloves will get you killed.
Suppose an evil person dusts a grocery store with anthrax. Or any of a million other nasty things. Any amount of opioid will kill a toddler. The possibilities are ALWAYS endless. I can kill a building full of people with seemingly random crap from the hardware store. Life is fragile, the list of ways to end it infinite.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Whew! A lot of deflection in that paragraph!
Doesn’t change the fact that this is a deadly threat to the public at large - we should give the death penalty to those that bomb buildings and endanger people with anthrax - or the other deflectives you mention.........so why don’t we give the death penalty to anyone who sells this crap that kills?
One difference is that addicts make the choice to endanger their lives - people working in a building that gets bombed make no such choice. They are true victims. The addict makes a choice to possibly die because of their own actions - while endangering the lives of innocents around them. Perhaps, that should warrant it’s own “death sentence” as well.