OK - Who wants to hear the tin-foil hyper-speculative stealth-nitro BOMBSHELL! theory of the day?
Caveat - there is no proof whatsoever (at least at this point) that this is correct.
Justine (victim) heard “loud sex” in the alley.
She concluded that it wasn’t voluntary, i.e. *Rape*.
Upon giving her report to the driving officer, the passenger officer (Noor) realized that she was about to put the finger on him as the rapist.
Noor decided to “solve” his problem in a very permanent manner.
I've thought since the beginning that she described a Muslim to the driving officer and Noor shot to defend a fellow Muslim.
Dayum, you should write for National Enquirer!
“Upon giving her report to the driving officer, the passenger officer (Noor) realized that she was about to put the finger on him as the rapist.
Noor decided to solve his problem in a very permanent manner.”
Like the bad guy boss in Pale Rider just before he gets drilled full of holes. “You. You!”
WTH???
Somebody else proposed the theory that Noor was protecting a fellow Somali.
Or, maybe they were BOTH involved - that's why both their cameras were off?
The cops were PARTNERS i.e. not roaming around raping. Your speculation about the motive of the killer is, shall we say, absurd.