Posted on 07/22/2017 12:41:29 PM PDT by AbolishCSEU
A Houston man is on the hook for $65,000 in child support for a child that's not his.
Gabriel Cornejo, 45, took a DNA test proving a child his ex-girlfriend had 16 years ago was not his.
The test was too late. In 2003, a child support court in Houston ruled that Cornejo owed his ex-girlfriend child support because, she claims, there was no way he wasn't the father.
(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...
Give me a break. Men aren't going to stop shooting their sperm all over the landscape, the sell outs aren't going to stop filling the little white dixie cups, and male judges aren't going to stop selling out at the alter of the camel toe.
The idea that men are the victims after decades of this is in itself evading personal responsibility.
This is the sort of thing that might cause a man to go “Postal”.
When you hear all those news stories about men who while on visitation killed their children and then committed suicide you know why
sounds like he needs a good lawyer...and maybe one of these next time?
Pure idiocy from a feminist leftist view amoral areligious view.
“How the hell do you come to the conclusion that if a man has sex then he is like a husband”
I guess they could just be animals.
Are you seriously advocating men being able to demand a woman abort?
You don’t belong here.
“so Im responsible for every woman Ive been with?”
As men, it should be that way for us, yes.
I know that is an anti-feminist anti-left old fashioned view, but it would be (was) a better world that way.
“the mother should have some financial responsibility as well. She shouldnt be able to sit on her ass and collect CS for her lifestyle.”
I’ll take that as your endorsement for welfare mothers.
So cause and causation or foreign concepts you?
When did I become responsible for what another man did?
“Boy you really hate men dont you.”
Plenty of men don’t merit any respect or sympathy.
He probably thought he was the cats meow when he was using her for sex.
“So cause and causation or foreign concepts you?
When did I become responsible for what another man did?”
If he hadn’t been using a woman for sex that wasn’t his wife, he wouldn’t have this problem, would he?
It’s what he did.
so a 23 year old guy who is not married is fully responsible for that woman, and is regarded as a husband if he has sex with her. And if she lies about taking the pill it is his responsibility and she has none. WOW.
“There was a case here in Texas several years ago where this guy was married for years, he and his wife had three kids, and all this time he didnt know she was fooling around on him all the time. She finally decided to leave him for another guy, filed for divorce and he requested DNA tests on his kids. The tests showed the kids had three different dads, none of them was him. The judge ordered him to pay child support and give everything to the wife because he had thought he was their dad and the kids thought so too. The guy said he cared about the kids but didnt think it was fair that he lost everything he worked for.”
Husband is the father when a woman has children.
He is their dad no matter what.
Good thing he sees it.
He seems like a decent fellow. Too decent in a way or he probably would have known better than to marry her.
You really are strange. You are advocating punishing a man for something that he didn’t do. Calling people who disagree with you a “feminist leftist” is sheer lunacy. What YOU advocate is punishing a man for, what I believe is the true reason, your OWN perceived failings and beliefs.
In the case described in the article; what about the man, who was the actual father of the child — what responsibility should he bear?
Do you not see the difference between being responsible for the offspring of extra-marital (or married) sex; and being made to pay for some other man’s extra-marital sex?
I’m just trying to figure out your “logic” in this matter.
“so a 23 year old guy who is not married is fully responsible for that woman, and is regarded as a husband if he has sex with her. And if she lies about taking the pill it is his responsibility and she has none. WOW.”
It’s amazing how far even supposed conservatives have fallen from Biblical morality.
What ever happened to having sex with your wife?
what if a guy is not married at 29, then does he not have sex, and if he never marries he should never have sex, and if he does then he is fully responsible and she is not!!!!!!!
“Do you not see the difference between being responsible for the offspring of extra-marital (or married) sex; and being made to pay for some other mans extra-marital sex?
Im just trying to figure out your logic in this matter.”
Of course the actual impregnator ought to have this responsibility.
Boo hoo.
If he had not had sex with someone who isn’t his wife, this rather bizarre and unfair thing wouldn’t have happened to him.
Can you understand that logic?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.