“Actually, many in the mainstream also understand basic Trumpian speech, but insist on interpreting it in interesting ways, that are rarely even remotely accurate.
I just saw John Dickerson try out strategy with Scaramucci; whining about three “conflicting” tweets on health care Trump put out. Dickerson evidently cannot grasp progression of ideas and action.
After watching Scaramucci, I can understand why Trump wanted him. He’s very good.
Tapper tried the same trick, hypocritical Trump, hypocritical Scaramucci, and so on.
Scaramucci pointed out Churchill and Reagan moving from DEM to conservative, and that it is normal for people to change and adapt, and to attack them as hypocrites is cheap and dishonest.