To: ForYourChildren
Hillary Clinton and her staffers still have access to sensitive government information WHAT? That's insane!
2 posted on
08/08/2017 5:35:52 PM PDT by
libertylover
(In 2016 small-town America got tired of being governed by people who don't know a boy from a girl.)
To: libertylover
That’s like allowing OJ Simpson to be in a room full of knives geez what is wrong with these people
To: libertylover
Five million individuals are said to have different levels of security clearances. Why not Huma? Carlos Danger?
And we wonder why leaks can not be even restrained— never mind stopped. It will not happen until there are restrictions that are sober and serious.
Even if Hillary loses her clearance, she has access to Bill’s clearance, or Madelyn Albright’s, or the list is practically endless.
21 posted on
08/08/2017 5:46:45 PM PDT by
RitaOK
(Viva Christo Rey! Public Education/Academia are the farm team for more Marxists coming... infinitum.)
To: libertylover
....Hillary Clinton and her staffers still have access to sensitive government information....
Has her clearance been revoked? Why does Rice or any other fired Democrat still have one? Something stinks here.
49 posted on
08/08/2017 8:04:16 PM PDT by
Sasparilla
( I'm Not Tired of Winning.)
To: libertylover
Patience, date of the Fox news article is 06/21/2017. Takes a little time to get things moving in DC. We’ll see what happens, hoping for Clinton’s demise!
To: libertylover
I wonder if they still have actual access or if FOX misinterpreted/assumed because they still have their clearances. The clearance is usually allowed to expire in normal time but access is taken away when one leave the job that required the access.
Of course, D.C. is such a cesspool that it may be that they still have access.
53 posted on
08/09/2017 3:23:52 AM PDT by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson