Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge: Democrat Bob Menendez Must Face Corruption Charge in Court
Free Beacon ^ | August 9, 2017 | Brent Scher

Posted on 08/09/2017 8:32:48 PM PDT by bobsunshine

A last-ditch attempt by Democratic senator Bob Menendez (N.J.) to avoid a federal corruption trial slated to start next month was rejected by a federal judge on Wednesday.

Menendez, accused of giving political favors to Florida eye doctor Salomon Melgen in exchange for campaign contributions and gifts, asked that the case against him be dismissed on account of the Supreme Court's 2016 decision to overturn the corruption conviction of former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell (R.).

Menendez's attorneys argued that none of the alleged assistance he offered Melgen were "official acts," and therefore, based on the Supreme Court's McDonnell decision, the legal argument against him was invalid.

U.S. District Court Judge William Walls said the determination of whether Menendez performed an "official act" in his attempts to benefit Melgen will be made during the trial, which is set to begin on Sept. 6.

"Whether the acts alleged in the Superseding Indictment satisfy the definition of an ‘official act’ under McDonnell is a factual determination that cannot be resolved before the Government has the opportunity to present evidence at trial," wrote Walls in his rejection of the dismissal request.

Menendez received campaign contributions from Melgen, in addition to flights on private jets and luxury vacations.

(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: corruptdems; corruption; menendez
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: bobsunshine

They still go after corrupt politicians in the US of A?
I thought they were exempt?


21 posted on 08/10/2017 9:16:44 AM PDT by Leep (Less talk more ACTiON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leep

I NYS we convict them. Then uniparty judges overturn the convictions.


22 posted on 08/10/2017 9:19:15 AM PDT by mewzilla (Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

Yes, they would, which is why it’s so stupid for the Republicans to think that Democrat voters would vote for a Republican if the candidate were the same race or sex. Democrats don’t really care about that stuff. They want “free” stuff.


23 posted on 08/11/2017 8:24:49 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX (For they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind. ~ Hosea 8:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

And if he doesn’t, they can just illegally replace him on the ballot at the last minute with a candidate that polls better (remember what they did with Toricelli in 2002)


24 posted on 08/12/2017 5:19:29 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson