I don't know all the facts of this incident, but if I were on the jury I'd have a hard time finding the defendant guilty of even a vehicular homicide or involuntary manslaughter charge in a case where he runs over a bunch of people blocking a freaking street.
So when my wife gets surrounded by BLM and she floors it to get away from them, she is a TERRORIST?
Thanks JEFF!
Don’t forget in all of this that BLM killed half a dozen policemen in Dallas, and probably another half dozen since.
What a major disappointment this putz is.
See how easy it is to say the word “terrorism”
(except when it actually applies)
Looks like we have one in this admin.
“Terrorism” means the use of attacks against a non-combatant civilian population in order to instill terror and achieve a political change. This is what all the Islamic attacks have been.
This does not even slightly meet that definition. It was a street battle - otherwise, why the bats, clubs, flaming aerosol cans, cement -filled soda cans, etc. - between two non-peaceful groups of civilians who came there to rumble. So in other words, it’s riot-related. If the guy did this intentionally, of course he’s guilty of murder and assault. But it’s not terrorism.
Sessions sure is animated about this.
BUT WHAT ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON YOU DAMN SCHMUCK!?
This is nuts. I can’t believe these idiots are falling for the press version of things and/or trying to appease the left on this. They should KNOW appeasement does not work.
The BLM and Antifa groups are the terrorists.
Second issue: I saw Nazi flags being waved in some news picture. A perfectly posed picture. Americans don't do that--not more than about 50 of them. I smell a false flag in this picture--infiltrated by Antifag, possibly with the collusion of the FBI.
“It does meet the definition of domestic terrorism in our statute,”
If the guy was just scared and panicked, it’s not terrorism. If he went there with the idea that he was going to mow some people down, it is terrorism.
Jeff what about the Thugs who brought bats and started the violence?
Jihad is happening in Va.?
Why about the AntiFa terrorists?
It’s starting to look like the attack in Charlottesville wasn’t an attack by the car driver but an attack ON the car driver. Also, here’s a report that “police were called off when violence started – they said, ‘We’re Leaving’”
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/…/reporter-mckelway-police…/
“Several police officers at the station here think the guy running people down wasn’t malicious. They said the driver was scared”
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search…;
The video below may support that the car was attacked before speeding up.
https://streamable.com/21gc9
A comment on GatewayPundit may have summed it up very well.
“The mayor and governor. Go straight to the top. Civil Rights were banned by someone at the top! Antifa showed up & the cops did not stand between them & those that had a permit. Antifa chased the non violent protestors out. Keep calm & pay attention folks. This was a set up.”
Car attack and other aspects of this incident look like a false flag operation by left-wing activists, who are trying to hang the “white nationalist” sign on the Trump Administration. The Trump admin is wisely refusing to let the democrats hang that sign on them, and are speaking out strongly against the car attack and other violence. Trump people know that it was probably a false flag operation by left-wingers, but it will be very tough to get enough evidence to prove this in court. So, they’re doing the next best thing and running damage control tactics to remove the sign the left-wingers are trying to hang on them.
These nasty incidents last weekend should not do any long-term damage to Trump and his administration.
AG is gonna have to get fitted for a new tux.
NYT = Not Yielding to Truth
Don’t believe these Lying Leftist Media outlets that proved themselves during the 2016 campaign to be operatives of the DNC and intentional liars. They are presumed to be lying and we should presume what they publish is a lie. The presumption can only be rebutted with the outlet providing clear and convincing evidence they are not lying.
We should be mostly publishing the truth on FR, not the lies, and as much good news as possible to bolster morale. We should find and post reliable sources that have already deconstructed the lie and replaced it with the truth and with a headline that says the truth. We need much more of that on FR IMO. The key is the headline and the first few sentences because not everyone has time to drill down. The endless stream of negative, lying headlines sabotages our purpose IMO.
