Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: davikkm

I could have sworn, when I was in high school (and that’s partly why I can’t remember for certain - it was a while ago) that we studied a Supreme Court ruling over something very, very similar.

Basically, the Supreme Court ruled that if you wanted to the dance, you had to dance to the music chosen by the man who paid the band!! In other words, if you want Federal funds, you have to follow the rules which the Feds create!!

Did this Supreme Court ruling change all of a sudden?!? I’m always curious how these old Supreme Court rulings aren’t used to stop wasting precious resources and time in Federal courts!!?!!


5 posted on 08/14/2017 12:08:28 PM PDT by ExTxMarine (Diversity is tolerance; diverse points of views will not be tolerated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ExTxMarine

Congress spends money, not the President.

A President can (and sometimes should) make things difficult, but in the end he can’t stop the money unless he vetoes the spending bill.


6 posted on 08/14/2017 12:13:24 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ExTxMarine

good memory.

SCOTUS - South Dakota v. Dole.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota_v._Dole

would it hold up vs. executive action ?


9 posted on 08/14/2017 12:24:56 PM PDT by stylin19a (Lynch & Clinton - Snakes on a Plane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson