Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Rejects Menendez’s Request To Delay His Corruption Trial Because He’s A Senator
Daily caller ^ | 9-1-17 | Kevin Daly

Posted on 09/01/2017 1:53:19 PM PDT by Bullish

A federal judge in New Jersey rejected Sen. Bob Menendez’s request to allow breaks in his criminal trial in order to fulfill his Senate duties, excoriating the senator for seeking “special treatment.”

Menendez’s lawyers filed a motion requesting that his upcoming criminal trial take recesses any time the senator is needed in Washington on official business. They argued that forcing the senator to leave an ongoing trial to attend to congressional business would violate his due process rights.

“A trial taking place during a session of Congress risks involuntarily denying Senator Menendez his rights to due process and confrontation, unless he elects to forego his constitutional duty to cast his vote on critical issues pending before Congress so that he can be present in the courtroom,” his lawyers argued.

U.S. District Judge William Walls appeared irritated by the request in a Friday order dismissing the motion.

“The court will not serve as concierge to any party or lawyer,” Walls wrote. “The motion – from a practical perspective – is nigh frivolous.”

He further added that he suspected the motion was part of a broader strategy to “impress the jurors” with Menendez’s importance.

The judge further said that most defendants have similar obligations, which the court does not accommodate.

“Defendant Menendez claims that he is in a ‘unique situation’ because his voting duties are ‘on a schedule not of his own making.’ But so are the duties of the radio repairman, the cab driver, and the businessman. Yet none would claim the right to dictate the schedule of their own criminal trial,” he wrote.

The senator has previously attempted to leverage his office in the course of the current prosecution. He attempted to escape indictment by arguing his activities were protected by the Constitution’s speak and debate clause, which protects lawmakers from prosecution in connection with official legislative work.

He faces 14 felony counts of various corruption charges.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: crime; menendez; trial
Bobby boy's going down and it's about damn time.
1 posted on 09/01/2017 1:53:19 PM PDT by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bullish

Judge’s correct answer...”Bull Sheite!!!”


2 posted on 09/01/2017 1:55:20 PM PDT by Don Corleone (.leave the gun, take the canolis, take it to the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

Mark my word, this POS will skate just like Hillary. When you are a member of “The Club” you don’t have to worry about punishment.


3 posted on 09/01/2017 1:56:19 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

He’s already had 5 years longer than any of us would have. Let Christie replace him with a Republican.


4 posted on 09/01/2017 2:01:20 PM PDT by Vic S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
Mark my word, this POS will skate just like Hillary. When you are a member of “The Club” you don’t have to worry about punishment.

There's been some dem congress critters who didn't skate. Your name has to be Clinton to gaurante a whitewash.

5 posted on 09/01/2017 2:02:00 PM PDT by Bullish (Whatever it takes to MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

Under the speech and debate clause, the judge cannot require Menendez to be in court when Congress is in session.


6 posted on 09/01/2017 2:05:32 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Seems the judge doesn’t care about that , huh?


7 posted on 09/01/2017 2:06:45 PM PDT by Bullish (Whatever it takes to MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

It’s likely that he’s guilty as hell, but no more so than a number of other Dhimmicraps.

Why Menendez particularly, while the rest skate? Did you notice that he was just about the only Democrat to oppose Hussein in Cuba policy and the Iran deal?


8 posted on 09/01/2017 2:07:06 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Christie will replace with a NJ RINO


9 posted on 09/01/2017 2:07:19 PM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

Like most judges, this one doesn’t give a flying you-know-what about the Constitution, which the judge neither knows nor respects.


10 posted on 09/01/2017 2:08:01 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Col Frank Slade

Which is only slightly better.

(RINOs can give you just as much socialism, but for a little discount.)


11 posted on 09/01/2017 2:08:43 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Yes, I know he went against Barky and shortly thereafter he was charged by Barky’s DOJ. I don’t think he has many friends in Congress on either side at this point.

I think he will get convicted.


12 posted on 09/01/2017 2:09:25 PM PDT by Bullish (Whatever it takes to MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

I didn’t catch his party. Could anybody inform me?


13 posted on 09/01/2017 3:37:37 PM PDT by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BraveMan

Will he or will he not appoint a Republican in time? Sessions should make him an offer he can’t refuse. Wouldn’t Clinton or the Kenyan?


14 posted on 09/01/2017 3:56:20 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BraveMan

You’re joking right? If so, then good one. If not, well he’s a dem of course.


15 posted on 09/01/2017 4:29:36 PM PDT by Bullish (Whatever it takes to MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

As the US Supreme has ruled, it can never be a duty of a public official to commit a crime. Crimes are ALWAYS committed in a personal capacity.


16 posted on 09/01/2017 7:20:12 PM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

When he committed the specified crimes,didn’t any rights as a senator go down the drain? Otherwise how could these people ever be prosecuted for anything?


17 posted on 09/01/2017 9:17:18 PM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson