Nice, concise summary of why this harridan belongs behind bars.
Yes indeed
There! Fixed it!
She is a venomous harridan, you know!
Here are Mirriam Webster's definitions: venomous = “expressing very strong hatred or anger” and harridan = “an angry and unpleasant woman : shrew.”
A bit redundant, perhaps, but VERY descriptive of HRC's character!
The buzz is at of the end of fiscal year 2014, the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) (an arm of The Clinton Foundation) had revenues of about $129 million.
Next in income was the Clinton Global Initiative with just over $23 million.
The Clinton Presidential Center in Arkansas raised nearly $12.5 million circa 2014. (Taxpayers contribute to this).
Lastly, the Clinton Climate Initiative with slightly under $8.3 million.
Remember this is only what they are admitting to....prolly much much more.
================================================
No reports on the big bucks the Clintons hid in these venues.
There are several separate Clinton foundations that maintain their own revenue streams. All these entities maintain separate operations for the Clintons’ pay-to-play global racketeering operations:
<><>the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI),
<><>the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton (BHCC) Foundation,
<><>the Clinton Foundation Hong Kong,
<><> William J. Clinton Foundation Charitable Trust (Kenya),
<><>William J. Clinton Foundation Charitable Trust (UK),
<><> the Clinton Foundation Insalingsstiftelse (Sweden).
<><> the Clinton/Guistra Partnership, Canada.
===========================================
FYI----The Clinton Global Initiative's Ignominious End (so they "say")
Real Clear Politics ^ | January 17, 2017 | Jim Geraghty / FR Posted by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
...April 15, 2017 ... the Clinton Global Initiative is formally shut down. The CGI is a program of the Clinton Foundation, centered around ... networking event of choice for corporations, nonprofits, nongovernmental organizations and wealthy philanthropists. -snip-
But there was never much official explanation of why CGI would need to shut down in the case of a Clinton defeat. After all, the world didn't run out of poor people or sick people on November 8.
But after the 2016 election (and Hillary's loss), some of the foundation's donors acted as if the causes CGI supported were no longer worthy. -snip-
Why would muriads of foreign governments suddenly lose interest in the charitable work the do-good Clinton Foundation purported to do?
They wouldn't, unless the Clinton Foundation and CGI had existed to give foreign governments and businessmen a way to curry favor with a future president .... Why keep operating if there's no influence left to peddle? -snip-
... WIkiLeaks documents revealed just how blurry the line was between the foundation's non-profit activities and Bill Clinton's for-profit activities. In a 2011 memo to Bill Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, John Podesta, and members of the foundation's board, the ex-president's longtime aide Doug Band attempted to clarify ... -snip-
Since 2001, President Clinton's business arrangements have yielded more than $30 million for him personally, with $66 million to be paid out over the next nine years should he choose to continue with the current engagements.
In short, when Band and his colleagues called up wealthy individuals and institutions — all of whom would have a strong incentive to be on good terms with Hillary Clinton, the likely future president — they sought financial help for the foundation and lucrative work for Bill Clinton. The line between charitable giving and the Clintons' personal enrichment was exceptionally blurry, and those involved knew it....(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
===================================
NOTE Huma Abedin cashed US govt paychecks working for Secy Hillary AND at the same time, she also cashed paychecks from the Clinton Foundation, and Teneo, Doug Band's outfit---said to be the pricey tool booth to get access to the Clintons.