[robroys woman]

I don’t think they know what the word “racism” means. They should look it up.

[eyeamok]

I don’t think they know what the word “racism” means. They should look it up.

Wouldn’t that be racist to ask them to look up something in a book written and printed by White People?

[ctdonath2]

“they [don’t] know what the word “racism” means.”

This.

What they’re calling “racism” is really “recognition of natural consequences of subculture behaviors”. Bad behavior begets bad consequences, regardless of race. Groups that favor bad behavior tend to teach that bad behavior to their kids.

I truly don’t care what race you are.
I do care how you behave.
If you behave badly, you’re going to suffer crippling socioeconomic consequences.
If you behave badly, your kids - who look like you - will learn to behave badly.
If you behave well, you’re going to enjoy successful socioeconomic consequences.
If you behave well, your kids - who look like you - will learn to behave well.
That appearance may correlate with behavior, and thus with consequences, is natural.
I’m not causing the correlation, your behavior chooses the correlation between consequences & appearance.

Baffles me that pointing this natural objectivity out gets me labeled as an arrogant racist.
Cause-and-effect is objective, and I don’t care what you look like - I care what you cause, and judge based on the effects thereof.

But that’s apparently too complex for them, so they declare “you’re [insert race here], so your success must be the result of cheating based on race, so you’re racist.” Idiots.

[No Socialist]

This has been the liberal standard for a long time.

How often are blacks (or others) charged with a hate crime against whites? Even when there was clear evidence?

Liberals are sick in the head.

[Let's Roll]

Of course they can. What do you think affirmative action is if not reverse racism?