NBC Worries Trump Will Cover Up JFK Assassination Files

Explain how Connelly’s wound was oblong in a way that does not include the bullet tumbling after already hitting JFK first.

101 posted on 10/02/2017 3:10:13 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie

To: SoCal Pubbie

Just as you stated before, I too and mainly because I don’t have time, don’t want to rehash every aspect of it. When I see these threads it interests me. Probably because I grew up and decades into my adulthood, having to see it rehashed. In any case, I have questions that have not been answered to my satisfaction and that’s my prerogative. You on the other hand and other snarky com padres and the ‘area 51’ mocking are a curiosity to me. You people use liberal tactics to mock people into shutting up the same as what we see them do to conservative speakers. Why? What’s in it for you people to try and shove the Warren Report down people’s throats lock, stock and barrel?

I have no clue how well your BS meter works but I know how mine works.

102 posted on 10/02/2017 4:22:43 AM PDT by MagnoliaB (You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)

What snarky comment did I post?

103 posted on 10/02/2017 8:09:52 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie

To: SoCal Pubbie

First tell me why you are trying to shove The Warren Commissions Version down everyone’s throat? Again, what are you getting out of discrediting anyone that thinks the government may have lied to us about what went down?

If you can’t answer that, then my conversation with you is done.

104 posted on 10/02/2017 8:43:30 AM PDT by MagnoliaB (You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)

I'm not trying to shove anything down anyone’s throat. And I don't want to discredit anyone save the Mark Lanes and David Liftons of the world. Lane in particular was a toll of the KGB. So I'm not getting anything out of it, except the satisfaction of people learning the truth, that Oswald killed JFK and acted alone. There simply is no evidence to the contrary. Mistaken witnesses no more invalidate the basic facts of the Warren Report than do claims of two shooters in Las Vegas last night. Nor do hearsay accounts of drug addicts, old strippers, or long abandoned mistresses.

The forensics point to the sixth floor window. The majority of witness point in the same direction. The gun found in the sniper's nest was his. His marksmanship has been replicated. Connelly’s wounds prove he was hit by a bullet fired from the rear, that struck someone else first. The doctors who actually worked on JFK agree that the shots came from behind. There are no other spent shell casings, or entry sounds from any other direction, or any other hard evidence of any other shooter.

There is no credible evidence that Oswald knew Ruby. Ruby had no prior knowledge of Oswald's transfer nor any special access to gain entry to the police building. He shot Oswald FOUR MINUTES after finishing his transaction at the Western Union office. Oswald's transfer had been delayed do Ruby should not have even been able to do the deed. The shooting hardly displayed the expertise and planning of a paid killer.

There are wired coincidences and bad luck involved with just about every infamous crime throughout history. That doesn't spell conspiracy.

105 posted on 10/02/2017 9:00:21 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie

To: SoCal Pubbie

Also I challenge conspiracy proponents for the same reason I argue with 9/11 Truthers.

106 posted on 10/02/2017 9:05:29 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie

“Boston Glob”....lol

107 posted on 10/02/2017 12:26:27 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))

To: stephenjohnbanker

Even their sports section has become unreadable.

108 posted on 10/03/2017 4:24:38 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (I'm with Steve McQueen: I live my life for myself and answer to nobody.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794