[MagnoliaB]

First tell me why you are trying to shove The Warren Commissions Version down everyone’s throat? Again, what are you getting out of discrediting anyone that thinks the government may have lied to us about what went down?

If you can’t answer that, then my conversation with you is done.

[SoCal Pubbie]

I'm not trying to shove anything down anyone’s throat. And I don't want to discredit anyone save the Mark Lanes and David Liftons of the world. Lane in particular was a toll of the KGB. So I'm not getting anything out of it, except the satisfaction of people learning the truth, that Oswald killed JFK and acted alone. There simply is no evidence to the contrary. Mistaken witnesses no more invalidate the basic facts of the Warren Report than do claims of two shooters in Las Vegas last night. Nor do hearsay accounts of drug addicts, old strippers, or long abandoned mistresses.

The forensics point to the sixth floor window. The majority of witness point in the same direction. The gun found in the sniper's nest was his. His marksmanship has been replicated. Connelly’s wounds prove he was hit by a bullet fired from the rear, that struck someone else first. The doctors who actually worked on JFK agree that the shots came from behind. There are no other spent shell casings, or entry sounds from any other direction, or any other hard evidence of any other shooter.

There is no credible evidence that Oswald knew Ruby. Ruby had no prior knowledge of Oswald's transfer nor any special access to gain entry to the police building. He shot Oswald FOUR MINUTES after finishing his transaction at the Western Union office. Oswald's transfer had been delayed do Ruby should not have even been able to do the deed. The shooting hardly displayed the expertise and planning of a paid killer.

There are wired coincidences and bad luck involved with just about every infamous crime throughout history. That doesn't spell conspiracy.