I understand that feeling that’s surging through the guy, and I’m willing to temporize this sentiment.
First of all, infringing gun rights requires a constitutional amendment to do it properly.
Secondly, if we must have gun control, it should be a state power, not federal.
Thirdly, guns with clips [magazines] which allow such fast reloads, and if they are converted from semi-automatic, they overheat. Therefore, if there MUST be gun control, it is a severe overreach for this event to trigger limiting too much — one clip-loaded semi automatic rifle per citizen would not make this kind of mass murder very likely.
Fourthly, without secure borders, machineguns can be smuggled across th border. So, SAFE BORDERS FIRST. [Note tagline.]
Thirdly, if there absolutely must be
While I understand why you said the things you did, I am not on board more gun control. If the laws we have didn’t prevent this, NOTHING EVER WILL.
As for states coming up with their own laws to infringe on our 2nd Amendment rights, why is it they can do that, but if they come up with some law that modifies racial rights, it would be ruled unConstitutional?
The U. S. Constitution is there for a reason. It assures every citizen certain rights, over and above what the government can deny them.
States should not be given the right to supersede the U. S. Constitution.