Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/06/2017 1:34:52 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

BEARE!!

NATE may make it #3!


2 posted on 10/06/2017 1:38:47 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Hard to say. The U.S. was far less populated in 1850. Could’ve been a dozen Cat 4 hurricanes some years but with so few people around to report them, Hu knew?


4 posted on 10/06/2017 1:43:12 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

after 100mph one cannot tell the difference


6 posted on 10/06/2017 1:51:06 PM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
It’s important to reiterate that because NHC assigns intensity using 5-kt increments (and will be doing so for the foreseeable future), neither storms in the historical record nor any future storms would have their SSHWS category changed as a result of this adjustment. Changing the Category 4 range to 130-156 mph, 113-136 kt, and 209-251 km/h simply allows all unit conversions from knots to be done correctly and keep storms in the correct category, regardless of the units used.

Guess they overlooked this part.

8 posted on 10/06/2017 1:56:47 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

LOL - typical MSM foolishness


10 posted on 10/06/2017 2:00:03 PM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

So we had 167 years without this happening again - after all those colonials and cowboys and Indians stopped driving their SUVs in 1850....


16 posted on 10/06/2017 4:01:45 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ( Christian is as Christian does mt-h)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
...and even Scientific American. 

SA has spewed the leftist crap for a LONG time now.

I subscribed for decades; but the shift away from Science to 'science' got so bad that I gave up on it during John Rennie's (seventh editor-in-chief, 1994–2009) first couple of years at the helm.



An editorial in the September 2016 issue of Scientific American has attacked US Presidential candidate Donald Trump for alleged "anti-science" attitudes and rhetoric. This marks the first time that the publication has forayed into commenting on US presidential politics. [17]
 
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_American

17 posted on 10/08/2017 3:56:19 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson