Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enlightened1
That’s been one of the main military plans for a long time

So the target list for war with NK has 150 tac nuke targets? BS.

Every piece of arty is targeted that is emplaced and within range of Seoul. Has NK upgraded their arty OOB, 35 miles is a long tube artillery shot?

2 million man army? Then have more than doubled that in the last 18 years.

Thus, the only way to stop this and not getting stuck in some sort of Vietnam or Afghanistan is with tactical nukes.

No it isn't. If it be nukes they won't be tactical.

15 posted on 10/07/2017 7:56:16 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: xone

General Douglas MacArthur wanted to use nukes in the 1950s in Korea. To say it’s not likely is simply not the case.

According to what I have read over the years is they have the ability to hit Seoul with Artillery and rockets. That’s not even debated.

Maybe it’s more than 2 million men, but that’s the number I have been hearing.

Tactical nukes tend to be smaller yielding than standard ICBM with multiple warheads.


20 posted on 10/07/2017 8:10:47 PM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson