I get the feeling a lot of these perverts may have something in common but I just can seem to figure out what it is.
FWIW, I wouldn’t assume the war in within the ‘Rat party. We don’t know WTH is going on, WTH this is coming out now. And we need to know.
‘Journalists’ protecting a Hollywood producer/big Dem donor??? You have to be kidding me! /s
The phony shock and outrage that a show biz mogul is a predator is, as we said in the 60s, A Laff Riot.
Why now? Why Weinstein? Who got out the long knives- and why?
EVERYONE of the Hollywood elite ( including deranged rabid anti -Trump naaaaasty woman Ashley Judd) knew and played along with this man - and he’s probably not the worst ( that would be the pedophiles)
So why Weinstein and why now?
The obamas who offered up their first born to him as a prestige intern are suspiciously silent
Weinstein insulted Carlos Slim at a social event. He went up to him and publicly complained about the quality of the marijuana and cocaine at the party. Notice however that Fallon, Colbert, CBS, NBC, Disney/ABC/ESPN,CNN remain bewildered about this embarrassment within progressive ranks and are saying nothing They know nothing. Nothing at all.
The NYT wanted to get out in front of this story now rather than next year’s election season. But you may be assured that they are holding on to the juicy stories about Republicans and conservatives.
Excellent questions. We all know why the media enabled Weinstein and other leftist elite pervs up to now. That’s the way the MSM rolls.
But why Weinstein? Why now?
I have been toiling the last decade to see Harry Reid indicted, and the efforts may finally bear fruit. I bring this up here because with Weinstein in flames, Weiner in jail, Debbie Wasserman Schultz in the docket - the Democrats may be in a bonfire by 2018 elections.
The Hypocrisy of the left is boundless.
One of the basic tenets of “feminism” was strong men of power taking advantage of weaker women with no power.
No greater example of this was President Clinton getting BJ in the Oval Office from an intern.
Compare the way the Democrats treated Clinton with the way they treated Trump over private conversation proves that point. The current defense of Weinstien she adds to that proof.
Of course we now know that regardless of the “cause” that the left supports, it is never the reason for their outrage.
They have only one goal, and that is to turn America into a Socialist Utopia.
They care nothing about minorities in general or black in particular.
Same with “women’s rights”, these are just mindless shock troops sent out to destroy anyone that stands in their way.
Gun control is not about saving lives, it is about disarming Americans.
They support open borders especially those from third world countries as a way cause chaos which they will use to gain more power.
Every action they take is designed to undermine America. They are like termites eating at our foundation.
So they do not care if powerful DEMOCRATS act badly because they really do not care as long as the check clears.
why was the creep thrown under the bus and Clinton wasn’t? Or Sandusky? Or Joe Paterno? Or any of a thousand others who should be exposed?
I think Harvey Weinstein must have browbeat The Hollywood Reporter, Variety and Los Angeles Times into getting favorable press. In short, these three publications could become material witnesses in any case against him.
The serial abuse of women never hurt Bill Clinton.
He’s still the biggest rock star in the Democrat Party.
I have worked in Hollywood since the late 1970s. Men have always used their power to gain sexual satisfaction, as women have used the promise of sexual satisfaction to gain power. “Haaaaaahvey” is hardly unique, any more than Madonna (to pick an easy example) was unique in using horizontal activities to ascend vertically in showbiz.
The New York Times was one of the enablers.
Who they going to out next? David Letterman?
Pushing the women’s vote, knowing they won’t be pissed at Leftist male offenders to abandon the Dims, but fired up to vote for Harris or Fauxahontas
Interesting.