Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBO: Bipartisan health care bill would reduce deficit by $4B over 10 years
The Hill ^ | 10/25/2017 | JESSIE HELLMANN

Posted on 10/25/2017 9:49:28 AM PDT by GIdget2004

A bipartisan deal to shore up ObamaCare's insurance markets would reduce the deficit by nearly $4 billion by 2027, according to a score released Wednesday by Congress's nonpartisan scorekeeper.

The bill, sponsored by Sens. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and Patty Murray (D-Wash.), would fund key ObamaCare insurer subsidies and give states more flexibility to change their ObamaCare programs.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said in its report Wednesday that the bill would not substantially impact the number of people with health insurance.

On the flip side, a CBO report released in August concluded that not funding the insurer payments, called cost sharing reductions, would increase the federal deficit by $194 billion through 2026.

Not funding the payments, which reimburse insurers for giving discounted copays and deductibles to low-income patients, could cause premiums for the most popular ObamaCare plans to increase by 25 percent by 2020.

Many Republicans have struggled to support the bipartisan agreement, calling the payments "bailouts" for insurance companies.

But Alexander and Murray have said that the bill would stabilize the insurance markets and reduce the deficit.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/25/2017 9:49:28 AM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Ceasing to funnel tax dollars to insurance companies will increase deficit 190 billion or so? Lefty moron’s would believe that.


2 posted on 10/25/2017 9:55:00 AM PDT by kjam22 (America need forgiveness from God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
There's a reason why nobody gives any credibility... any ...to the CBO. Actually there are dozens of reasons. THEY ARE NEVER RIGHT ABOUT ANYTHING!!!!!!

I say disband and get rid of the CBO. The slow learning assholes.

3 posted on 10/25/2017 9:57:13 AM PDT by Gargantua (The wheel is spinnin' and it can't slow down... ;^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

John McCain and one other Republican will vote against it.


4 posted on 10/25/2017 9:57:27 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Wasn’t this whole thing litigated a week or two ago? Didn’t President Trump say he wouldn’t sign such a bill into law?


5 posted on 10/25/2017 9:58:04 AM PDT by LIConFem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
4 billion ... over 10 years ...

That is chump change ...

6 posted on 10/25/2017 10:16:44 AM PDT by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

I can’t believe they still have the nerve to trot out that old “reducing the deficit over 10 years” nonsense.

Yeah, I think I’ll reduce my credit card debt over 10 years, for now I’ll just put that widescreen 4K TV on my Mastercard.


7 posted on 10/25/2017 10:17:00 AM PDT by Junk Silver ("It's a little hard to herd people onto trains when they're shooting at you." SirLurkedalot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Bailouts for insurance companies are a non-starter and indicative of how the swamp operates. $$$’s to insurance comes back in the form of political donations.


8 posted on 10/25/2017 10:23:28 AM PDT by Chauncey Gardiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

$4 billion over ten years doesn’t even qualify as a rounding error. I am not saying it is a bad thing, if it’s true, which there is very little reason to believe. I am saying that such an estimate is ludicrous on its face. It’s like saying that temperatures in Peoria will average .004 degree cooler over the next ten years. It’s below the threshold of measurement.


9 posted on 10/25/2017 10:24:01 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

To quote the late Colonel Potter: “Horse Hockey’”.


10 posted on 10/25/2017 10:25:03 AM PDT by anoldafvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Want to cut the deficit by even more? Defund NPR.


11 posted on 10/25/2017 10:28:28 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Has the CBO ever been right in any of its forecasts?

Would the goverment save all ObamaCare expenditures if it was just repealed?


12 posted on 10/25/2017 10:29:43 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

NO - how hard is NO to understand


13 posted on 10/25/2017 10:32:05 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dartuser

You took the words right out of my mouth. If the CBO had said $4T, I would have been delirious.


14 posted on 10/25/2017 10:51:36 AM PDT by huckfillary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua
The CBO has about as much credibility as those credit rating agencies(partners in crime)which played a major role in the '08 financial crash.

Hmmm, all those CSI shows always point to who/what benefited from the crime...in order to find the perp.

Let's see, who actually BENEFITED from the '08 crash...

1) Those in on the financial scams + those who saw the BS for what it was(house of cards), and bet against it

AND...

2) The demon'rat party(Presidency, 70(filibuster proof)Senate, large majority in House).

It's all about who/what controls the levers of power...which makes me think next year(mid-term elections)may bring about another financial slam(many of the same bubbles are MUCH bigger).

...and we know d@mn well who'll get the blame, the dem-media will see to it.

The deep state will sacrifice a few(some literally)just to put on a good show for the sheeple, but the major players will NEVER pay a price...because it would take too many 'rat people and organizations(business/politics/media/academia)down with them.

The only thing that TRULY threatens these cretins is a free/unfiltered/uncompromised internet, the consolidation(collusion)among internet service providers as well as blacklisting by major social-media players should be a warning to whats afoot on that front.

15 posted on 10/25/2017 10:58:36 AM PDT by RckyRaCoCo (FUMSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Even more if we just did full repeal.


16 posted on 10/25/2017 11:47:51 AM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson