Posted on 11/07/2017 2:30:09 PM PST by drewh
Disgraced former CBS News anchor Dan Rather has been making his media rounds to promote his new book, entitled What Unites Us. Tuesday morning he appeared on Morning Joe, to discuss the NFL protests, the lack of “civility” in our country, and what patriotism means to him, to an enraptured MSNBC panel.
Despite Rather’s own partisan pontificating on Facebook over the "con man" "liar" Trump, the liberal hosts let Rather drone on and on about the “lack of civility” the country is currently facing, and argue his support for the”patriotic” NFL protests, which he claimed “history” will “justify” like they did with “women’s right to vote.”
After a warm and gooey introduction, Morning Joe host Willie Geist asked Rather his take on the NFL protests, and what patriotism means today:
We have this ongoing debate about what patriotism is really and the latest flash point has been in the NFL. Some say it's patriotic to stand for the national anthem. I think most Americans believe that's patriotic. Others have said it's patriotic to dissent. That that’s what it means to be an American. When you think something is unjust, you ought to dissent. How do we begin to define what patriotism is today?
Rather answered that although he stands for the anthem with his hand over his heart, he understands that dissent is “as American as the Revolutionary War” or as “apple pie.” He went on to argue that everyone needs to respect, and listen to the anthem kneelers, because they aren’t “disrespecting the country or the military,” they are “calling attention to injustice.”
That’s when Rather went really tone-deaf, arguing for “civility,” not able to recognize his own part in causing division with his hyperbolic Facebook posts, or that the overwhelming majority of Americans who disagree with the anthem protests don’t find that they bring the country together.
Rather even compared the NFL protests to the right to vote, saying that “history justifies their dissent:”
[S]o I think it's important to listen to one another. And the most important thing is to lower our voices. We need an injection of civility with one another. Respect for the other person's point of view. That doesn't mean we don't stand up for our principles, for example with the Ku Klux Klan. Take one example. It doesn’t mean you have to nod your head and say, Yes yes yes I understand the Ku Klux Klan. You can be true to your principles and still respect the right of people to dissent. And indeed the need for people to dissent. Let’s not forget that dissenters in their time are frequently seen as outliers, even unpatriotic. But as time goes along, history justifies their dissent. Women's right to vote for example. Can you believe we spent almost the first fifth of the 20th century and still didn't give women the right to vote. Those women we're talking about women's right to vote back in the 19th century, were seen as radically dissenters and some people saw them unpatriotic. We need to keep that in mind.
Later on, Geist brought up the “divisions” in this country, comparing it to the 1960s, asking Rather to explain what “parallels” he saw today, culturally. Rather answered that the country has gone through very divided times in the past, even going back to the Civil War, so he was optimistic that we would get through this time. However, only if we admit that the country is still taking away rights from blacks, apparently:
“We're going to be okay. But we're going to be okay if we address our deep problems. Race being on my list number one. We make great progress with civil rights. We have a long way to go,” Rather stated.
“We have not gotten there,” host Mika Brzezinski added.
She wrapped up the interview, gushing it was “great to see him and hear his voice.” Rather paid her his own compliments, saying he was “so proud” of Brzezinski and she “just went from one triumph to another.” While journalists and media outlets are constantly touting their perceived reputation as “truth-tellers,” they don’t seem to have any problem frequently looking to a disgraced anchor, who was fired for reporting on fabricated documents against President Bush, for wisdom and words of “truth.”
Rather’s shoddy reporting is all but forgotten by the liberal news media, who are so quick to forgive their own, that NBC’s Savannah Guthrie can even ask Rather for advice on how to “enhance the media’s credibility” so people don’t think they “make up stories,” and be completely serious while saying it.
. .
.
Hey Dan......dooshebagsezwhat?
Rather is a disgrace to his fellow man.
Interesting. I don’t remember the women marching against our service men or the police. They were matching FOR rights and NOT AGAINST! Huge difference.
No fool like a old senile fool
And he was so supportive of dissent during the Obastard regime.
Black millionaires can already vote.
Yes, to be on the right side of history, a corporation must alienate a large percentage of their customers, who will simply stop buying their product. They may go out of business, but they’ll make the world a better place by self destructing in the name of a noble cause. Brilliant thinking.
The brothers will be selling drugs in the hood long before that happens.
History will justify the firing of Dan Rather as a disgraced fraud.
Rather is a moron.
“Fake But Accurate” Rather drink some Slow Joe Biden “smartest guy in the world” juice?
I got a case of the willies, the buckwheats reading that
Dan Rather; Stolen Valor posterboy
Roses are red, violets are blue,
Dan Rather lies, so what else is new?
If I remember correctly, Dan Rather got hundred of “UN-VALENTINES when he was pushing his fake story on TV.
Well well, look who’s come out of the woodwork, it’s ole Honeydipper Dan.
Eternal thanks to Freepers and Buckhead who started the avalanche with that post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.