Posted on 11/10/2017 8:17:36 AM PST by deplorableindc
Well, that IS half of humankind.
Or the liquor stores.
Lesbian sex must not be good enough as they always turn to food for their real pleasure.
Yeah the sewer district of that swamp Birmingham......
Apparently "because she said so" is enough proof these days, to swamp creatures, at least.
These sad (gay is oxymoron) women are possibly seeking solace in a sin because they are not perceiving it anywhere else.
If Jesus could walk today and could speak to some of these women, they might change their minds.
Bare cries to repent are meaningless without completing the expression. Repent to what? Don’t give us a Christ that’s just a mouthful of mumbles.
Their very complaint could be a clue to what kind of burr is under their bustles. A bearer of Christ who will sympathize with what they suffered (hello, Roy, here’s your chance to go Christ class, even if you sacrifice a little superficial dignity yourself) and pledge support in God to combat this, could get not just their votes, but their souls for the Lord.
Because women who accuse men of wrongdoing must always be believed. Always.
Unless they are Paula Jones. Or Juanita Broaddrick. Or Kathleen Willey.
Or Monica Lewinsky. Or Gennifer Flowers. Or Dolly Kyle Browning.
Or Sandra Allen James. Or Carolyn Moffet. So forth and so on.
Proof as in some impeccable eye witness, no.
But the back-off to a retort of “Fake News” sounds a trifle dodgey and less than straight shooting to me.
“I didn’t do anything immoral with a woman, in spite of the allegations” is what we need to hear from this would-be holy man. Or else “I did something immoral, even though not illegal, and now I have a new attitude and wish to show it in senatorial service.”
I figured it was something like that.
Now we know why men won’t go near them.
Or, why they don’t want to go near men
“Shut up”, she explained.
Innocent until proven guilty: It’s the American way!
Innocent until PROVEN guilty. People that make judgments before ascertaining the facts are morons.
As far as convicting in a court of law.
However, when someone, like Roy, brings up moral issues as a center of his quest, that automatically becomes a center of discussion.
Roy could still handle this well in the spirit of the Lord. But outside of the spirit of the Lord, he risks looking rigid, dogmatic, graceless, loveless in his morals.
I hate to say this, but men need to shut up defending him and listen to the women’s pain . . .
That hulking bull dyke with a baseball bat might just put some teeth in her belief. Anyone who feels the ground shake & hears the battle cry “MEN!!!!” should run like h*ll.
I choose to defend future Senator Moore.
JoMa
Actually, placing the fake allegation into the context of so many other known fake allegations is an excellent strategy. We know from all too many other instances that the Washington Post can not be believed.
To simply deny is what the left desires: they make the false claim and leave the victim to deny it. Some percent - say five percent - of the population hits the tainted bait and stays home or votes for that nice blue-dog Democrat that loves his husband.
Remember the damaging story of Willard Romney killing that woman?
some lesbos can be quite manly I believe.....lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.