This statement here is pure BS, and outs Shaprio as a faux-servative fraud!
Per the FBI, there was PROOF of Hillary’s maleficence, but Comey didn’t have the balls to do anything about it.
There is ZERO proof against Moore... only speculation and well choreographed smears and lies.
[The first argument: Moore hasn’t been convicted of anything, and due process requires us to consider him innocent until proven guilty. This argument is empty, because our decision to vote for or against a particular candidate doesn’t require due process — Hillary Clinton wasn’t convicted of anything, either, except in the minds of the public. Due process determines whether you go to jail. The public determines whether it thinks politicians ought to be handed power.]
RE: There is ZERO proof against Moore... only speculation and well choreographed smears and lies.
I would really like to give Moore the benefit of the doubt.
But his response to Hannity’s questions were anything but assuring...
Just read this:
“I’m not going to dispute anything, but I don’t remember anything like that”
Why not just say — I DISPUTE IT. IT DID NOT HAPPEN. PERIOD.
And here is the giveaway — he said he “didn’t “generally” date teenagers when he was in his 30s,”
To me, that means he did. If the girls were 17 and the age of consent in Alabama is 16, then there’s nothing illegal in what he did. The only question then is — did anything untoward happen during the “date”.