Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alter Kaker
Do you consider losing millions of residents to nuclear, biological, chemical or conventional attack much difficulty?

The North doesn't have the capacity to lauch a nuclear missle. Any other missle launch would have to be part of a first strike by the Norks and I think there is zero chance of that. And even if they did, I think the Aegis system could take them out. That leaves artillery which is a problem, but a manageable one.

27 posted on 11/18/2017 2:14:43 PM PST by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Poison Pill
Uh... I don't share your confidence. The North Koreans absolutely have missiles accurate enough to hit South Korea and there's clear evidence they've miniaturized warheads to fit on top of them. Can they assemble the full missile? I have no idea but I wouldn't put money on them not being able to. For that matter, I don't see nosecone issues being a major hurdle to them being able to hit an American city or five in the near future.

BUT... even if you're right. Let's say no missiles can get through. The Norks have elaborate infilitrafion networks set up - tunnels, minisubs, etc. to smuggle men and contraband into South Korea. The Norks don't need missiles to hit Seoul - they just need a truck bomb. Can they pull it off? Maybe yes maybe no, but they're smart enough and advanced enough that that's a bet I wouldn't want to take.

30 posted on 11/18/2017 11:06:25 PM PST by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson