——I do think she’s about to be taken down,-—
She will not go down. Her struggle will destroy the party
“...she’s about to be taken down...”
The Democrat scu&bags in the electorate won’t stand for it since they believe in “democracy”; that is, riots in the streets, threats, violence, insults, intimidation, burning vehicles, sharpened sticks, and, not to mention, flags bearing the yellow hammer and sickle on a red background.
IMHO
And that is exactly why we shouldn’t want her to disappear. Let her go out there, as much as she can, and make a fool of herself. The longer she stays in the spotlight, the harder it is for the other Dem’s to take it over. That causes more and more chaos in their party and forces them to go even harder Left for the attention. Let them all lead each other over the edge.
She led the bimbo eruptions effort, destroying the women as being sluts or nuts while her husband ran rampant. She led the media to defend the indefensible. And try as they might to defend the Clintons now, in the new race to virtue signal, the media is finally admitting their mistake.
Her ill temper and horrifying personality behind the mask of being nice has been chronicled by one of her major Secret Service defenders and others. She was censured long ago for being dishonest and mean spirited by her own chairman during the Watergate hearings long ago. Her money lust and greed were there to see in her cattle futures gains.
Hillary took the press down with her... they became a reflection of her creepiness... How do YOU New York Times and Washington Post feel now about getting in bed with the Clintons all these years? Bob Woodward? YOU there? George Stephanopoulos? Chris Matthews? Mika and Joe? YOU guys covered for Hillary ... and for Bill the rapists\... and thrust that culture on the rest of the country. Shame on all of you in the press.