oh im sure DNC money is making them act out... but hell you cant deny the fact he was actually going after teens!! even if he didnt touch them... why on earth would a grown man go after teens??? thats muzzie level bad right there...
Elvis Presley started courting Priscilla when she was 14. Loretta Lynn married at 15. I don’t think adult guys courting teen girls was that unusual in the south 40 or more years ago.
My friends who are private school teachers-both male and female-practically lived in fear of precocious and predatory 13-16 year old “kids” when they taught in public schools-hence their change of professional venue-they are convinced that the public education system has totally lost any moral compass they might have had-I think that is right-the sh**t they are teaching to kids is sexualizing them far too early.
I do not believe Moore’s accuser at all-the story has been blown so full of holes that you could drive a Freightliner through it-that cry-on-cue woman was hoping she’d win a legal lottery and is pissed that it isn’t going to happen-she gives us all a bad name...
You seem to be ignorant of most of human history.
First of all, all the claims against Moore involving girls under the age of 16 have already been discredited. If you were an honest player you would know that and act accordingly, instead of trolling here.
Second, for most of modern history, say, since the ascendancy of Western Civilization, it has been the expected and standard practice for men to go out and make a career and establish themselves, then go find themselves a woman of prime childbearing age to make a family with. Standard. Practice. In fact, expected, and to act otherwise was considered rash in many parts of society. This only changed recently, and gradually, since WWII when many women entered the work force for good, and since the 1960s and 1970s, during the sexual revolution which made women much more accessible to men for sex.
That is why, prior to the modern era, the age gap in marriages was often several decades. At the other extreme, people also married a lot younger and even a century ago, marriages as young as 10 were not unheard of. It didn't just stop overnight. It has gradually declined over the past decades so that it can now be presented as immoral to the gullible by progressives and other social manipulators. News flash - in most of the world, including the West and much of the USA, even, it's not a big deal or even worthy of comment, and in many parts of the world, the practice is much more extreme and always has been (and likely will be for a long time to come).
Then there is the biological argument: Men are able to reproduce at a far greater age than women. Whether we were designed that way, or evolved that way, is irrelevant to the point. It is what it is, and it suggests that there is a benefit to the species for it.
Moore has not been proven to be guilty of anything immoral, or even unusual for the era in question.
So, get off your high horse and stop being a tool of the progressives who are trying to undermine and topple our society and culture.
Is he still going after teens? The true sign of those who prey on the underaged is that they are unable to control themselves. If he were anywhere near as bad as you imagine, there would be a trail of current day teens from here (Madison) to Mobile filing complaints against him.
Either he didn’t do what they say at all, or he’s not what you imagine. He’s been a husband of one wife, a proven Christian who stands up for God, family and the Constitution. That is more than any one of the other clowns in the Senate can say.
I live here in Alabama. I’m voting for him. There is nothing Mitch or his reach around the aisle friends, the democrats, can do to change my mind. Praise God.
They’ll just have to get used to having Moore in the Senate.
Why don’t you try some historical context and basic demographics? Mr. Moore served in the military (including Vietnam), came home and went to lawschool, eating up his twenties.
By the time he hit the dating market in 1977 Alabama, fully 2/3’s of women in their 20’s were married. So the 16-19 year old bracket would have been the most plentiful and obvious group of single eligible females for courtship.