Posted on 12/01/2017 6:14:38 AM PST by GIdget2004
February 30th.
From what I know so far, it reminds me more of the Scooter Libby conviction.
Pathetic.
Obama illegally wiretapped General Flynn to obtain indictment.
Trump will pardon him the day Hillary is indicted.
Yup.
I doubt Mueller had him issue statements implicating Trump in illegalities if this is what they hook him for.
Good point. Pleading guilty to charges of lying to the FBI means Flynn has absolutely zero credibility as a witness.
SO UNFAIR. WHERE IS THE LYING HILLARY?
LOCK HER UP.
Totally WRONG that Hillary walks the streets.
Good point. Pleading guilty to charges of lying to the FBI means Flynn has absolutely zero credibility as a witness.
I think that’s what is happening as well. This is just setting the stage for what comes next.
As for what IS next? I have no idea. All of this just seems so bizarre. I’m not understanding the motivation of these people ... unless it was just a monetary scam of some sort.
Yep...Flynn is a Democrat. Worked for Obama for two years. Worked for Trump administration for three weeks before being fired for lying to Pence.
25th National Security Advisor
In office
January 20, 2017 – February 13, 2017
President
Donald Trump
Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency
In office
July 24, 2012 – August 7, 2014
President
Barack Obama
[Flynn should have went with Hillary’s “I don’t recall” strategy when talking withe the Fed’s. On second thought, everyone should use that strategy.]
He should have plead the 5th, like every crooked Democrap admin official has done when questioned.
My only hesitation is if he has something salacious to give up
Or imply lie to cover up getting paid previously to lobby for Russian interests
Hum, dec of 16...whom was president then? Ah, the Brown Bomber. So, to determine what was said at that time, exactly, in a meeting between two people, how would the government know what was said, implied or asked for?? Where did this conversation happen.....how about in Trump Tower. IOW, the Brown Bomber was monitoring conversations between the staff of an incoming president and others.
BTW, it is an informational filing, not an indictment so they at least they did not have to listen to the grand jurors laughing about it.
Chances are pretty good that he did.
The question is was their anything nefarious behind the false statement.
If the matter was contested, materialality would be an issue.
I was never convinced that Mueller was engaged in some kind of behind-the-scenes conspiracy with Trump on this, but I was pretty sure from the start that Donald Trump was never a target of Mueller -- and Trump knew this.
The weaponization of politics is upon us.
The left was saying this. Roger Stone said he didn’t flip, but who knows?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.