Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
Sessions mentioned the 27 leaker investigations during his most recent testimony before Congress.

Correct, but Sessions only mentioned it during intense questioning over what he was personally getting done at the DoJ, in light of his recusal, and turns out this process started even before his term, and being IG is likely completely hands off for him. Hopefully the report can finally lead to some actual criminal investigations, since the IG inspection is not a criminal investigation, but I have little faith in Sessions based on his non-performance so far.

The rumor is that Strzog was removed from Mueller’s staff because he was a leaker, not because of his political views.

Is True Pundit (LOL) your only source for this? And the info he supposedly leaked was the story of the SWAT-ike Manafort raid, that was politically very damaging to Mueller? For what supposed purpose? Thanks!

47 posted on 12/05/2017 8:40:21 PM PST by Golden Eagle (Donald Trump: "There's a lot of people disappointed in the Justice department, including me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Golden Eagle

That you don’t know Gateway Pundit, from a ‘True Pundit’, speaks volumes.


50 posted on 12/05/2017 8:46:17 PM PST by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Golden Eagle

“The rumor is that Strzog was removed from Mueller’s staff because he was a leaker, not because of his political views.”

“Is True Pundit (LOL) your only source for this?”

- - - -

Mr Deep Stzoke could be one of the 27.

Direct link to the report.

“Inspector General’s Report Looking at 27 Leakers Will Cause MAJOR SHAKE-UP AT FBI”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wavpfe6SxuI


59 posted on 12/05/2017 9:28:33 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Golden Eagle
Is True Pundit (LOL) your only source for this? Thanks!

No, there are other sources both contemporaneous at the time of his transfer and currently.

Strzok monitored intercepts of the Russian Embassy and already knew what Flynn and the Russian ambassador had discussed. So why did he need to ask him about what he already knew? Was he trying to trap him in a lie? Also, who leaked the intercepts to the press?

August 16, 2017A top FBI investigator has unexpectedly stepped away from special counsel Mueller's Russia probe

"Strzok's departure also came one week after The Washington Post reported that Mueller had obtained a search warrant to raid the home of President Donald Trump's former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort. The Post report cited "people familiar with the search," prompting questions about whether anyone on Mueller's team had leaked the existence of the search warrant to the Post."

And the info he supposedly leaked was the story of the SWAT-ike Manafort raid, that was politically very damaging to Mueller? For what supposed purpose?

Pretty obvious. To intimidate other future subjects of interest. The leak was meant to demonstrate that the Mueller team was playing hardball and would go to any length to get at the "truth." Such actions could also spook other targets under surveillance to take actions like destroying possible incriminating evidence.

As far as being politically damaging to Mueller, there was very little outcry from the MSM about the treatment of Manafort. In fact, there were indications that Mueller was doing his job. There was very little sympathy for Manafort who was characterized as a slimeball who advocated for the Russians in Ukraine and was involved in possible money laundering. Bottom line: Manafort got what he deserved. No MSM push back on the protection of civil liberties. Instead, the MSM was gloating about the treatment of Manafort and viewed it as a sign of his guilt.

86 posted on 12/06/2017 6:19:17 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson