Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Franks of Arizona, who asked staffers if they would bear his children as surrogates, - will resign
Washington Post ^ | 12-7-17 | By Mike DeBonis and Michelle Ye Hee Le

Posted on 12/07/2017 6:06:28 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-142 next last
To: Anti-Bubba182

Idiot should just have gone the ADOPTION ROUTE. Plenty of children/babies needing homes.

If you chose this route you go through a liscensed agency who pre-screens willing surgates. With the proper contracts and fees paid.


121 posted on 12/08/2017 6:38:20 AM PST by GailA (Ret. SCPO wife: suck it up buttercups it's President Donald Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

From his statement linked in this thread, “But in the midst of this current cultural and media climate, I am deeply convinced I would be unable to complete a fair House Ethics investigation before distorted and
sensationalized versions of this story would put me, my family, my staff, and my noble colleagues in the House of Representatives through hyperbolized public
excoriation. Rather than allow a sensationalized trial by media damage those things I love most, this morning I notified House leadership that I will be leaving
Congress as of January 31st, 2018.”

“I am deeply convinced I would be unable to complete a fair House Ethics investigation” You do NOT quit if there is truly nothing to see. He knows the game, obviously when you are an elected official you face scrutiny and a biased media, that is nothing new. There has got to be more to this. I just get the feeling that he is quitting to avoid the scrutiny and possibly being found guilty of something completely unrelated to what we see here.


122 posted on 12/08/2017 6:44:02 AM PST by azkathy (We the people are FED UP-pun intended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Dumb bastard should have just hired an attorney to find somebody. It’s how everyone else does it. That’s the common method.

But he wanted to bypass the artificial insemination part and use the more traditional approach. :)

123 posted on 12/08/2017 6:46:41 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: azkathy

The surrogacy thing, appalling if he did it, had to be the tip of the iceberg. And if this is the least objectionable thing he did....Yikes. Good riddence.


124 posted on 12/08/2017 6:48:44 AM PST by mewzilla (Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: HKMk23; Presbyterian Reporter

It is still asking for implantation of the product, in part, of your boss’s sperm—which is just a hideous thing for a boss to ask a female employee about.

The GOP continues to be the stupid party.


125 posted on 12/08/2017 7:01:33 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

Still way too private a thing for a boss to ask an employee.

But the employee should have told him so at the time and been done with it.

This years-later firing over this type of however inappropriate error is absurd. And it is all a set up to try to get Trump—which is what Pence’s good pal Ryan has been up to all along.


126 posted on 12/08/2017 7:23:51 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

I wish he did not resign.

It signals what the Dims want to happen - allegations alone are the standard for “guilt”.

In Franks case, the worst that seems to have happened is the two females Franks spoke to - about him & his wife’s problem of not being able to conceive, and their looking for a surrogate - said they felt “uncomfortable”.

So now “feeling uncomfortable” is equal with “sexual harassment or abuse”??

What about simply telling the person you feel uncomfortable then and there at the time; then they apologize (as I think in Frank’s case he had no intent to make anyone uncomfortable), and the issue is over.

Guilt has until very recently required intention and or KNOWING an action was going to be received negatively whether you intended it to or not.

Now “guilt” not only no longer requires intention, it does not even require knowledge beforehand that the action would have been received negatively. The only thing needed for “guilt” is the other persons “feelings”. Yet “feelings” are 100% up to the person that has them, arise from their own thinking and not directly from (and may not even arise from) actions someone takes. YOU CHOOSE to “feel” by how you think.

In this case Franks was suppose to know, beforehand, what the two females were going to think about the subject they were asked about??

I wish Franks would take back his resignation. I’d be happy to become his public P.R. person.


127 posted on 12/08/2017 7:24:11 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
FWIW, this is so dang weird, I’m thinking that there had to be way more than this going on. And he copped to this to get out of having the rest of his dirty laundry aired.

In the workplace one needs to go out of their way to avoid a perception of inappropriate behavior. That's just the way it is. That plus being married, I can tell you just how few women actually respect that relationship and crap can spin out of control before one gets a hand on it (uhm, so to speak.)

Nope we are not all saints but for him to simply leave, there has to be something more to this, there just has to be.

You don't just walk away without a fight if you are innocent. Look at Judge Moore - if you stand righteous before the Lord you can prevail. What is this guy's excuse?

128 posted on 12/08/2017 7:24:48 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists...Socialists...Fascists & AntiFa...Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
...this doesn’t rise to the level of sexual harassment...

I think I agree. I don't know exactly what this is.

129 posted on 12/08/2017 7:27:47 AM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

The wife should have done the asking or some third party.

congresscritter was stupid. It was a stupid, stupid, stupid thing to do and he should have known it was extremely risky.

He flushed his job right down the John.


130 posted on 12/08/2017 7:43:30 AM PST by Gasshog (When in trouble or in doubt, run in circles scream and shout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HKMk23
You should consider an important distinction between "sexual" and "orgasmic."

Surrogacy is not "orgasmic" but it >b>is sexual by definition, since we procreate sexually. It's called sexual reproduction. Having offspring is a major part, maybe the major part, of human sexuality, of being a male or a female.

Having children with anybody other than your spouse violates the exclusivity of the vows and the meaning of faithful monogamy.

Moreover, surrogacy divides women up into separate zones for exploitation: the vagina, the ovaries, the uterus, the heart and mind where the baby-mother bonding is formed. Divided up.

Surrogacy requires a psychologically "surgical" detachment between the baby and the mother who carries him in her womb. It amputates baby-mother bonding, or --- to use another analogy --- it starves it to death. It separates childbearing from maternal bonding, and thus separates the maternal womb from the maternal heart.

No way good intentions can justify bad actions. Surrogacy is de-personalization from the git-go: it intentionally, by plan, denies the baby's right to his primordial maternal bond, and leaves a wound on the soul of the deliberately-bereft gestational mother.

It doesn't matter if the person solicited to the scheme of mothering-without-mothering is paid or unpaid, an employee, a family member, a fertility clinic specialist or your former girlfriend. It's de-personalizing per se.

131 posted on 12/08/2017 8:31:57 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Stone cold sober, as a matter of fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

I never called it sexual harassment. It would be more properly called solicitation to reproductive concubinage.


132 posted on 12/08/2017 8:33:50 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Stone cold sober, as a matter of fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Boomer
He did nothing wrong so unless you are part of the GOPe swamp or a rabid dem; you really should not be talking like Franks is guilty or creepy of anything.

If he asked subordinates or co-workers to be a surrogate for him and his wife, that is creepy and he should resign. It's totally inappropriate.

If he was and asked subordinates questions about general issues such as agencies or doctors that can help with surrogacy process, then he should not resign.

133 posted on 12/08/2017 9:29:37 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Boomer
He did nothing wrong so unless you are part of the GOPe swamp or a rabid dem; you really should not be talking like Franks is guilty or creepy of anything.

If he asked subordinates or co-workers to be a surrogate for him and his wife, that is creepy and he should resign. It's totally inappropriate.

If he was and asked subordinates questions about general issues such as agencies or doctors that can help with surrogacy process, then he should not resign.

134 posted on 12/08/2017 9:29:51 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

“This just isn’t a problem for me.”

Me either. Assuming he was seriously interested in finding a surrogate for artificial insemination, and not using it as a pick-up line (and no one is saying different), then this is just not an issue.

There must be something more to the story, or why else would he agree to resign?


135 posted on 12/08/2017 9:36:49 AM PST by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Fury

Word in AZ is there was another incident he would rather not discuss so this one was used a viable reason.

Either way it’s a damn shame to lose a good conservative rep with an A+ NRA rating. I just hope we can replace him with an equally good Freedom Caucus type person and not some GOPe cuck.


136 posted on 12/08/2017 10:04:30 AM PST by Boomer (TisOK2BWhite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

And apparently, a number of people here on FR want to believe the Washington Post’s claim that they heard from 3 anonymous Republicans. From Fake News WaPo. Silliness.


137 posted on 12/08/2017 10:13:06 AM PST by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

You didn’t call it sexual harassment but that’s what RINO Paul Ryan called it then told this very conservative pro lifer he needed to resign, Ryan is a snake in the grass. He hates conservatives like his big brother McConnell.


138 posted on 12/08/2017 10:52:28 AM PST by NKP_Vet ("Man without God descends into madness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: enumerated
There must be something more to the story, or why else would he agree to resign?

I think the nail just met the hammer.

Probably something else out there.

139 posted on 12/08/2017 10:57:27 AM PST by Bodleian_Girl (Go ahead and vote for Roy Moore. The liberals & GOPe hate Alabama anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: HKMk23
Inasmuch as a baby results --- a baby given its existence, ultimately, by the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of Life --- I guess any way of "getting" a baby could be called, in that sense alone, life-affirming.

However, since there is only one legitimate way to "get" a baby --- via the marital act, intercourse, with your one-and-only honestly married spouse --- then with due respect to the baby, all the other ways are illegitimate: fornication, adultery, artificial insemination, prostitution, IVF, rape, surrogacy, breeding farms (like the Nazi eugenicists) or ---looking forward to the near-future --- gestation by machine.

These demean the baby. In view of the sanctity of marriage and the natural rights of the baby, these "ways to get" should not be.

140 posted on 12/08/2017 11:10:06 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("God bless the child who's got his own." - Billie Holliday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson