I think your summary of my positions look pretty accurate and fall in line with the text of relevant constitutional clauses “cited”.
Sort of like criminal and civil law being independent, even though both venues may be appraoched on the same conduct. See, for example, OJ Simpson cases. Criminal acquittal, found liable in civil court for wrongful death.
A given fact pattern can give rise to action in one venue or the other, or both, or neither.
I understand that you disagree with that - I'm just laying it out as my point of view.
Thanks for the civil exchange.