Posted on 01/06/2018 2:03:26 PM PST by Eddie01
I am not complaining that you posted it - it’s good to know what they’re saying.
Obviously Bannon never had Trump’s MAGA as his guiding light, right from the start. I was totally tricked and thought he was a fantastic guy. But I was wrong.
If not for him, Wolff wouldn’t have had any access, apparently.
Let me get this straight.
Bannon will only defend himself if Trump does not insult him?.
BS.
Bannon hasn’t denied what he said and Wolff says he has hours
of tapes of all interviews.
Slate and any other fake media will do whatever they can to make Trump look bad. As far as Bannon’s role in this book, it doesn’t look good to me!
Yeah let’s all believe Slate!
He could have comments out immediately and corrected the record with a simple simple 10 word sentence sooner than later- no need for a huge , self serving committe drafted response written under bosses order to save his career
Even if true, Bannon was working under duress because he was about to be fired.
Exactly!
Has anyone noticed ,no one was fired for giving Wolff absolute access to west wing people...No one was condemned or apologized for allowing him there...He stated people were told to go talk to him...I still think there is more to this than just a hatchet job on Trump...
“BS”
Without question.
I’m upset Bannon stuck a shiv in Trump’s back and is behind all of this distraction including these BS articles and doesn’t have the balls to step to a mic and be a man either way.
Believe Shapiro here.
Don’t like how Shapiro went against Roy Moore though, the level to which he believed the false accusers.
So should I believe Shapiro here?
Your missing the point.
Slate is #fakenews.
This is trash Bannon time for feeding the monster and not being a man to defend his actions.
Slate on Wolff, well worth the read folks, very negative...
I’m not here to defend Slate, but I do believe this article adds some context to this current article.
If you read it, I think you’ll see what I mean.
It goes after Wollf with both feet.
We all know what Slate had been, and almost certainly still is. Still, credit where credit is due...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3619157/posts
Suuuurrree...how convenient. How long was this story out before Trump responded? Seems to me like Bannon should have been the first one right of the gate to denounce as soon as it became public. Can’t tell me that someone like him doesnt’ know instantly what the media puts out there on an hourly basis..
THIS IS A MEDIA CREATED CRAPSTORM
AND EVERYONE FELL FOR IT
AGAIN
Traitor’s never learn that both sides end up hating you. If it’s’ true that he’s taking Chines money,then who’s the traitor?
Yeah, this is pysops.... kabuki. That serves us right now.
Slate still exists? I thought they were bankrupt.
Bannon looks and acts like a homeless drunk.
Ditto
If he was going to issue that statement disavowing the book, he should have gone ahead and issued that statement regardless of what Trump said. He could have taken a small step at mitigating the damage he has caused.
As time goes on, I see many parallels emerging between Reagan and Trump, but in one respect they are very different. Reagan’s immediate circle of White House aides were intensely loyal to him and were always prepared to resign and sacrifice their personal legacy to protect the Reagan presidency, because they recognized how important that was for the future of the nation.
Trump’s job has been made much more difficult because he has been surrounded by petty individuals who put their personal importance above the task of restoring our nation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.