Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

However, the fact is that a significant number of people with a not-so-high income will pay more. Singles and retirees are particularly likely to end up owing an additional $1000-3000 on incomes under $100,000.


2 posted on 01/07/2018 6:07:36 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: proxy_user

“a significant number of people with a not-so-high income will pay more. Singles and retirees are particularly likely to end up owing an additional $1000-3000 on incomes under $100,000.”

Really? Please explain how doubling the standard deduction and increasing the child exemption increases taxes?

Only some filers who itemize should pay more -as in people earning >$250k who itemize the bejeezus out of their returns.

Hardly anyone below 100,000 will itemize because the standard deduction is doubling.

Personally, I’m due a $4,600 deduction. IOW a $4600 pay raise.


5 posted on 01/07/2018 6:17:03 AM PST by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user
My husband is retired from the Army plus we are both senior citizens. He hasn't gotten his retirement statement from the army yet. Normally he gets it by the end of December. We both got our statement from the Social Security. He got a $5 raise per month, I did get none. Both our premium for medicare went up though.

I really wished the House and Senate had done it sooner than waiting so long.

7 posted on 01/07/2018 6:21:22 AM PST by Kaslin (Quid est Veritas?: What Is Truth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user
retirees are particularly likely to end up owing an additional $1000-3000 on incomes under $100,000
That describes me (70 y/o, retired and income <$100K) and for the privilege of paying MORE in taxes I'm supposed to vote for a billionaire in 2020?????
Oh, and WTF is welfare reform, medicare reform, the wall, an end to Obamacare ... ???
8 posted on 01/07/2018 6:21:42 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user

Please, no snark.

These “single people” and “retirees” shall still not be going on EBT or Section 8 housing. While there may somewhat less disposable income, these individuals are in a position where they can rearrange their daily expenses so the the NET disposable income is virtually unchanged.

No expense is absolutely fixed and immutable. Downsizing is an option in virtually every aspect of your life. And who knows, with simplification, life may become even more satisfactory.


10 posted on 01/07/2018 6:22:24 AM PST by alloysteel (Sometimes I have to tell myself, it just isn't worth the jail time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user

instead of throwing out generalities, how about explain the exact circumstances you are talking about?

Most will see their taxes reduced. Some in high tax states will pay more - because of their high local taxes no longer being deductible. The fault -and solution-lies within those states. Federal and state taxes shouldn’t have been mingled in the first place.


16 posted on 01/07/2018 6:59:02 AM PST by CottonBall (Thank you, Julian!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user

sorry i didn’t see that you had already done so


18 posted on 01/07/2018 7:02:43 AM PST by CottonBall (Thank you, Julian!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user

“However, the fact is that a significant number of people with a not-so-high income will pay more.”

No, that is NOT a fact.

That is idiotic liberal propaganda for the feeble minded to believe.


25 posted on 01/07/2018 7:45:51 AM PST by CodeToad (CWII is coming. Arm Up! They Are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user

However, the fact is that a significant number of people with a not-so-high income will pay more. Singles and retirees are particularly likely to end up owing an additional $1000-3000 on incomes under $100,000.”

That’s where I am. Since I cannot now deduct my big home equity loan I will pay about $2,000 per year more. I save some tax money on the new rates, but the lack of home equity deduction counteracts that savings, adds more taxes, and I pay more.

The bright spot, though, is most of us with big home equity loans also have a stock portfolio and since Trump was elected I have made several times over this additional $2,000 extra tax I will have to pay. Boosting the earnings of the corporations will increase the market even more.


39 posted on 01/07/2018 9:30:35 AM PST by angry elephant (My MAGA cap is from a rally in Washingon state in May 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson