Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GM unveils autonomous Bolt EV without steering wheel or pedal, aims to bring it to market next year
electrkek.com ^ | Jan. 12th 2018 | Fred Lambert

Posted on 01/12/2018 4:36:18 PM PST by equaviator

Today, GM unveiled the first image of its upcoming autonomous fourth-generation Bolt EV-based vehicle – the “first without a steering wheel or pedal.”

The automaker also says that it filed a petition asking the DOT permission to deploy the vehicle as soon as next year.

The move represents an accelerated self-driving timeline for the company, which could potentially leapfrog most other companies working on the technology since the most common timeline is a commercial launch in 2020-2022.

The vehicle would represent the next generation of Cruise AV autonomous car based on the Bolt EV.

In June, GM announced the completion of the first batch of 130 Chevy Bolt EV autonomous prototypes at its Orion Assembly Plant located in Orion Township, Michigan...They are already using part of their fleet to carry Cruise employees “anywhere in San Francisco using their app” – an early version of the service they plan to offer to the public someday.

Although GM claims to be the 1st without a steering wheel or pedal, Google has demonstrated pedal-less, steeringwheel-less autonomous vehicles first as part of its Google X labs in 2014 and now part of its Waymo spinoff. Google has since added back steering wheels to its own vehicles and *steered* the organization to more as add-ons to existing vehicles, especially Lexus crossovers and Chrysler Pacifica Hybrids.

A few months later, they claimed to be ready to “mass produce” self-driving Chevy Bolt EVs and they announced an expansion of the test fleet to New York...In order to plead their case for the safety of their vehicle and submit their petition for the permission to deploy the vehicle, GM released a new “2018 Self-Driving Safety Report”.

The report explains the various passive and active safety features of the vehicle as well as all the redundant hardware.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: selfdriving; wontflyinhialeah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 last
To: adorno

I don’t want to see people getting too hopped up over these driver-less vehicles because they take the fun out of driving and I think there are millions of car owners who would agree. If the technology is supposed to be yet another one of those things that saves us from ourselves then I’m not interested. Driving a car is fun. Being driven in a car isn’t unless you’ve been invited to join in a limo party.


161 posted on 01/15/2018 12:06:48 PM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

To a lot of people, perhaps most, driving is not fun, not after the initial few years of driving and after the novelty wears off.

Cars and trucks are just transportation, though there will be many who enjoy driving themselves.

I’m pretty sure that, if driverless vehicles prove to be safe and less expensive, and gives people a lot more free time to do other things, that eventually, nobody will miss the driver-involved vehicles. Even those that enjoy driving, will move on.

But, perhaps there will be a future for people-driven cars, where they can enjoy themselves, but on tracks and areas that are specifically set up for that kind of enjoyment.

If airplanes had been designed from the beginning to be easy to operate as everyday transportation, and if had also been affordable, that people would find that very difficult to give up too. But, the regular Joe and Jane out there don’t miss that at all, just like we don’t miss horseback riding or the horse-and-buggy. If we were to take away the horse-and-buggy from the Amish, they would be adversely affected, but they too will be taken off the roads, or the roads will be modified to give them their own lanes.

In any case, I’m pretty sure that as time passes, driverless vehicles will become the norm.


162 posted on 01/15/2018 1:00:00 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: adorno

“as time passes, driverless vehicles will become the norm.

No offense but I hope you’re wrong. You don’t know what you’ve got until it’s gone.


163 posted on 01/15/2018 1:41:03 PM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
Then it's not a drone. It's a manned octocopter.

True. I was at fault for not addressing that earlier. I just jumped from the Drone idea to the Flying Car idea without shame.

164 posted on 01/15/2018 3:24:02 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: equaviator
No offense but I hope you’re wrong. You don’t know what you’ve got until it’s gone.

There are some things which need to be gone. Accidents which kill many thousands in the U.S. alone, need to be gone. Paying $35,000 or more for vehicles, needs to be gone. Paying taxes for vehicle purchases, needs to be gone. Paying high prices for automobile insurance, needs to be gone. Paying good money for maintenance and repairs, needs to be gone. Paying for parking spaces, needs to be gone. Paying to maintain garages in homes, needs to be gone. Paying for fuel and then paying high-taxes for fuels/electricity, needs to be gone.

Worrying about dying in auto accidents, needs to be gone. Getting hit by drunk or impaired drivers, needs to be gone. Worrying about staying awake at the wheel, needs to be gone.

Having the extra time in a vehicle to work or do pleasurable things, is a very welcome change.

As far as I'm concerned, the advantages of driverless vehicles far outweigh the measly number of what some see as pleasurable activities.
165 posted on 01/15/2018 4:25:49 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Where does it end? Are airliners next? Where are my crash-free airplanes?...my banana peel-free sidewalks? There is no such thing as a risk-free America and there never will be.


166 posted on 01/15/2018 5:25:14 PM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: equaviator
Where does it end?

There is no end. Technology is taking over. Have you ever heard of robots and computers? And lately, have you heard of the "home assistants" like Alexa and Google Home, and the numerous home-automation gadgets which will be assisting you in the "smart home"?

Are airliners next?

Haven't you heard of the private Uber and Lyft planes? They're under development as we speak.



Where are my crash-free airplanes?

Not possible until gravity is gotten rid of. Even the smart planes and smart vehicles, will still have to obey the laws of nature, meaning that, unless someone figures out a way around gravity, there will be "mishaps".

...my banana peel-free sidewalks?

Now you're getting ridiculous, but, even that might not be a problem in the future, when robots might be doing the peeling of bananas and then discarding the peels for you and won't be dropping them anywhere for people to slip and fall.

There is no such thing as a risk-free America and there never will be.

Nobody has ever claimed that there won't be any risks. What there will be a lot fewer risks with a lot better technological future.

BTW, why did you feel that you had to get away from the subject at hand, which was EVs and autonomous vehicles?
167 posted on 01/15/2018 5:57:06 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: adorno

No, I was just egging you on to see how far you were willing to go in answering a series of strictly rhetorical questions.


168 posted on 01/16/2018 4:49:15 AM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: equaviator
No, I was just egging you on to see how far you were willing to go in answering a series of strictly rhetorical questions.

Actually, in the context of today's advanced and advancing technology, those questions are real, and many people will ask them and expect answers.

I'm glad to have helped. ;)
169 posted on 01/16/2018 5:16:18 AM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: adorno

If you’re happy, I’m happy.


170 posted on 01/16/2018 10:19:32 AM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

Like I said, glad to have helped.

Now, glad to have made you happy. ;)


171 posted on 01/16/2018 11:03:59 AM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson