Posted on 01/26/2018 11:40:37 AM PST by detective
Harvey Weinstein made his assistant clean semen off the couch after his sexual encounters, according to a new lawsuit filed in Manhattan federal court. Sandeep Rehal, who worked at The Weinstein Company for two years between 2013 and 2015, claims she felt demeaned and terrified while working for the disgraced film mogul.
Weinstein even made the then-26-year-old type emails he dictated while naked, according to the suit.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
Interns get tough jobs. Monica was supposed to clean up the blue dress.
She had to clean up his Harvey Wein-stains?
People who work in hospitals and nursing homes clean up a lot worse messes on a regular basis.
My hat is off for them for the work they do.
Sandeep got hired because he showed a lot of spunk. Not his own.
I just don’t get it.
I am sure that some people may read my posts and conclude I am all for disgusting perverts like that doing whatever they want, but that isn’t the case.
She wasn’t chained to the desk. When he walked in naked, she should have stood up, said “I quit” and walked out the door, even if she DIDN’T report him to law enforcement for indecent exposure at the least. But to keep doing it, AND to clean up a filthy couch stained with that...why?
She aint too sharp....takes 2 years to figger out you dont like the job? Good grief y’awl....Weinsteins sounds like a rich psychotic...and a fool and his money are soon parted...like watching 2 stoned drunks with deep psychological issues fight in a parking lot...
"Yeah, yeah, I took care of it."
Leftists are uniformly disturbed people, it informs all of their ideas and their worldview. They simply cannot fathom that there are normal people out there.
“Sandeep got hired because he showed a lot of spunk. Not his own.”
Sandeep Rehal was a 26 year old female.
Harvey is rich, yet he buys furniture without Scotchguard?
“It was a choice. She could have left at any time, and people leave well paying jobs for far worse.
I think she rationalized it to herself to continue working there.”
Maybe she needed the job and could not afford to quit.
Many people are forced to live paycheck to paycheck.
Out of those hundreds of women he supposedly abused, many of them share the blame for not bringing this to the attention of the authorities.
If his first victim had complained to the police and EEOC, how many of those hundreds of women who came after her would have had to endure it?
Perhaps all of them.
Perhaps none.
Or, he might have been arrested and disgraced, and there might not have been a job to get abused at.
“I think she rationalized it to herself to continue working there.”
Agreed, and that’s how Hollywood has always been from the beginning.
Many people (both men and women) will do whatever it takes to achieve their “dreams” of Fame & Fortune, including sell themselves or their bodies to get what they want. The only difference between many Hollywood stars and the prostitutes on Hollywood Blvd is the price they were willing to sell themselves for. Some have made a fortune and are household names (Meryl Streep) and will defend the system that made them rich, but most never get beyond the casting couch and end up in gutter. The only innocent victims in Hollywood are the child actors (like Corey Haim).
JMHO.
I think she rationalized it to herself to continue working there.
I’m thinking she helped Harvey put his stuff on that casting couch. Anybody looking for a job in Hollywood knew the score. This is all revisionist history now.
What?
"You'll never clean couches in this town again!"...................
Possibly, and I have considered that.
If you have to live paycheck to paycheck, what things will a person do?
As a parent, if you had a daughter, what would you think if she was well fed and well dressed, and gave those disgusting details about that job? (I know likely how you would think, but it was a mostly rhetorical question)
Me, I would say “Sweetheart, I know that working in the film industry is important to you, and he is a powerful guy with lots of connections, but...is that worth it? Do you really think having to clean up like that, look at his fat, hairy, naked body, have him touch your private parts...is that worth it?”
Point is, if it is worth it, then...you do it, no questions asked and no regrets because you make that judgement.
This just hits me all wrong that she talks about how abused she was. And she WAS abused. But there is personal responsibility here, IMO.
Isn’t some of this stuff illegal, i.e., creating a hostile, dangerous or inappropriate work environment?
This person should have reported Weinstein to OSHA. What if she or someone else had contracted an STD from being in his office?
Hair mousse...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.