Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeeSharp

The discussion is not about the defn of monopoly. It’s about patent rights that keep thieves from stealing discoveries. It is analogous to secure facilities to keep out the thieves. Find the definition of patent and what it is for. You never had a patent but you may have had property. Do you not expect to keep thieves out of it? Why don’t you stick with the left wing sites. you are simply not going to cheat people, steal, or beg your way to the next handout without giving something in return. Stop being so childish.


75 posted on 02/07/2018 12:26:01 PM PST by Neoliberalnot (MSM is our greatest threat. Disney, Comcast, Google Hollywood, NYTimes, WaPo, CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Neoliberalnot
You are the one who questioned the definition of monopoly and denied that patents are monopolies, and then started demanding sources which I provided.

Patents have nothing to do with stealing since ideas are not property. Patents are a legal means of using the threat of force in order to artificially raise prices. They are monopolies. For this reason, the new cancer treatment will not be cheap to patients, even if it is cheap to produce.

76 posted on 02/07/2018 12:36:28 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson