I’m glad the Guardian’s writers are smarter thinkers.
I guess my undergrad and grad (to doctorate) degrees in math, physics, and EE were not sufficient for me to deduce that the poor data gathering, poor data analysis, documented lying, and collusion about climate change were due to the fact that I could see for myself that the “science” was pretty much not science at all.
Justly mortified, I shall return to university and obtain the most intellectual degree of all, one which will allow me to overcome the shortcomings of years of real math, physics and engineering.
I shall pursue a journalism degree.
/s
Right there with you. I guess my 3 degrees (one undergrad and two masters) in science and engineering, coupled with 30+ years in computer simulation and large-scale modeling just aren't enough. I just can't see past all the fundamental shortcomings of the climate models, can't see past how they are being intentionally mis-used for wild predictions dozens and hundreds of years in the future when they are demonstrably non-predictive of even current conditions... I must need help with some of that liberal "critical thinking." Clearly a love of algebra, math, physics and precision are not enough. ;-) /s
You clearly lack the critical thinking skills the author is espousing. Your degree MUST be in Womyn and African Studies.
That was an awesome rant!