[Future Useless Eater]

There’s a simple gender-less fix for most (now supposedly sexist) references to “man” or “men”

just use HUMAN

MAN changes to HUMAN (a sexless word)

MEN changes to HUMANS

[snarkpup]

MAN changes to HUMAN (a sexless word)

Oops! "Human" contains "man;" so we need to change this to "huperson." Oops! That contains "son;" so we need to change this (one more time, with feeling) to "huperchild."

So the actual word that should have been used is "huperchildkind."

[Bigg Red]

The word “man” means “person”, but this pantywaist doesn’t know that. I wonder if he changes “human” to “huperson” or “woman” to “woperson”.

I am a woman who is smart enough to know that the term “mankind” includes me.

[User901]

Woman has the root word man in it. How are they gonna get away from that one. Do we need a new term for the description of "people" with female parts?

Odd thought - does the original meaning for the designation of woman for the female equate to womb+man for woman?